Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

How Utah's ZIP codes measure up on health

The ZipVitals Score across Utah — built one ZIP code at a time, then rolled up to the state by resident population.

Data release 2026284 of 289 ZIP codes scored · 3.3M residents represented

Open the full ranking →Download the data (CSV)How the Score works

Score snapshot

57.56Statewide ZipVitals Scorepopulation-weighted average of its ZIP codes
54.70Median scoremiddle of 284 scored ZIPs
72.18Highest score84098 · Park City
19.63Lowest score84536 · Monument Valley
52.55Spreadpoints between highest & lowest ZIP

People & national context

#13State rankof 51 states and equivalents with a computed score
21%Residents in below-average ZIPs0.68M of 3.3M, in ZIPs scoring under the national average (53.48)
0.98MResidents in the top 50 ZIPs30% of the state
0.32MResidents in the bottom 50 ZIPs10% of the state
0ZIPs in the national top 100—

Utah's ZIP codes, ranked

Highest-scoring

Top 50 of 284
  1. 184098in Park City · 20,357 residents72.18
  2. 284060in Park City · 8,619 residents70.35
  3. 384049in Midway · 6,833 residents70.30
  4. 484004in Alpine · 10,427 residents68.28
  5. 584045in Saratoga Springs · 45,429 residents66.77
  6. 684109in Millcreek · 25,544 residents66.62
  7. 784664in Mapleton · 13,032 residents66.45
  8. 884043in Lehi · 88,390 residents66.16
  9. 984326in Millville · 1,949 residents65.88
  10. 1084018in Croydon · 182 residents65.46
  11. 1184082in Wallsburg · 744 residents65.43
  12. 1284003in American Fork · 57,430 residents65.33
  13. 1384318in Hyde Park · 5,604 residents65.31
  14. 1484653in Salem · 13,051 residents65.24
  15. 1584097in Orem · 22,217 residents65.20
  16. 1684036in Kamas · 9,241 residents64.98
  17. 1784108in Emigration Canyon · 22,390 residents64.90
  18. 1884092in Sandy · 27,651 residents64.78
  19. 1984042in Lindon · 11,725 residents64.61
  20. 2084124in Millcreek · 22,609 residents64.58
  21. 2184310in Eden · 4,577 residents64.23
  22. 2284032in Independence · 26,111 residents64.03
  23. 2384325in Mendon · 2,525 residents63.93
  24. 2484317in Huntsville · 2,962 residents63.86
  25. 2584332in Providence · 8,954 residents63.80
  26. 2684062in Pleasant Grove · 47,813 residents63.70
  27. 2784050in Morgan · 12,620 residents63.67
  28. 2884765in Santa Clara · 8,152 residents63.19
  29. 2984055in Oakley · 1,584 residents63.08
  30. 3084328in Paradise · 1,681 residents63.05
  31. 3184061in Peoa · 422 residents63.04
  32. 3284093in Sandy · 23,871 residents62.98
  33. 3384005in Eagle Mountain · 52,530 residents62.93
  34. 3484014in Centerville · 16,679 residents62.76
  35. 3584333in Richmond · 3,093 residents62.73
  36. 3684025in Farmington · 25,389 residents62.61
  37. 3784121in Brighton · 38,912 residents62.54
  38. 3884339in Wellsville · 6,295 residents62.48
  39. 3984660in Spanish Fork · 48,583 residents62.47
  40. 4084040in Layton · 28,509 residents62.28
  41. 4184320in Lewiston · 3,162 residents62.27
  42. 4284335in Smithfield · 16,210 residents62.17
  43. 4384742in Kanarraville · 386 residents62.17
  44. 4484020in Draper · 50,278 residents62.09
  45. 4584037in Kaysville · 39,415 residents62.09
  46. 4684651in Payson · 29,503 residents61.95
  47. 4784095in South Jordan · 38,532 residents61.90
  48. 4884626in Elberta · 396 residents61.60
  49. 4984781in Pine Valley · 355 residents61.60
  50. 5084105in Salt Lake City · 23,491 residents61.52
Open the full Utah ranking →One page, all 284 scored ZIPs — sortable by score, residents, or place

What the distribution shows

Across Utah’s 289 ZIP codes, the ZipVitals Score spans a wide range. 284 of them carry enough measured coverage across all nine health domains to enter the population-weighted composite above; the rest are held out rather than filled from a coarser geography.

Assembled from the same ZIP-level data as every per-ZIP page. Read the full method →

Where Utah stands, domain by domain

The ZipVitals Score above combines nine domains of health into one number. This is where Utah's ZIP codes sit against ZIP codes across the country on each of them, weighted by how many residents live in each one — strongest at the top.

Strongest domain

Risk Behavior · 92nd

Weighted by residents, this state’s ZIP codes sit around the 92nd percentile of US ZIP codes here — its highest of the nine scoring domains.

Weakest domain

Preventive Care · 17th

Weighted by residents, this state’s ZIP codes sit around the 17th percentile of US ZIP codes here — its lowest of the nine scoring domains.

Risk Behavior92
Chronic Disease Burden88
Social Need / SDOH81
Climate / Disaster Risk80
Disability74
Healthcare Access64
Environmental Hazard26
Mental Health23
Preventive Care17

Read each bar as a national percentile from 0 to 100. The dark line marks the national median: a bar past it means Utah's ZIP codes typically place above most ZIP codes in the country on that domain. A domain Utah cannot place honestly is shown greyed as "Not enough data" rather than given a number.

Each figure is the population-weighted average of this state's ZIP codes' standing on that domain, compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes. A ZIP code counts toward a domain only if it carries enough measured data on it and enough of Utah's residents live in the ZIP codes that do; the rest are held out rather than filled in from a coarser geography. Read the full method →

Why this matters

The ZipVitals Score combines nine domains of health — from chronic disease and preventive care to environmental hazard, social need, and healthcare access — into one 0–100 index for each ZIP code, computed the same way everywhere from public federal and academic data. The Utah figures on this page are population-weighted rollups of those per-ZIP scores, so they describe Utah's residents rather than a coarser geography relabeled as the state.

A high score describes favorable documented conditions; it is not a claim about individual residents, and it does not capture everything that shapes a community's health. Where a ZIP code scores low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.