Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

84745

in La Verkin, UtahPopulation 4,476

49.40/ 100

Ranked #17,086 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #237 of 284 Utah ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #20 of 20 St. George, UT ZIPs (bottom 5.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

194 mi

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

34.3 mi

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

9.9%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.23 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

8.1%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2.2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

49.9 days/year

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, La Verkin, Utah (ZIP 84745) sits in the bottom 47% nationally (17,086th) and the bottom 17% of Utah (237th).

continue reading

A demanding profile, and several measures drive it: distance to an emergency room registers in the top 1.4% nationally, modeled tree cover is at the national minimum, and crowded housing lies in the top 6.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat registers in the top 9.4% nationally. On the stronger side, distance to a Superfund site is in the top 1.1% nationally, and modeled binge drinking lies in the bottom 1.2% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and mental-health providers is in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the bottom 6.7% nationally, and fatal road crashes registers in the bottom 7.7% nationally.

Put plainly, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 84737, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the St. George, UT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.3%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.7%26.1–31.2
High blood pressure among adults35.5%32.4–38.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.0–9.8
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.2–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.6–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.0%6.7–9.2
Depression among adults28.0%24.9–31.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.5–13.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.5%31.4–37.6
Obesity among adults37.5%32.8–42.2
Stroke among adults4.0%3.5–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.7%11.2–16.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.0%9.6–14.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.1%67.9–73.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.6%66.9–73.9
Cholesterol screening among adults78.6%75.7–81.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.3%55.7–64.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.4%62.2–68.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.7%63.3–77.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults9.9%8.1–11.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.5%9.2–13.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.7%17.3–24.3
Short sleep duration among adults35.6%31.2–40.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.0%18.9–25.2
Frequent mental distress among adults18.4%16.2–20.7
Frequent physical distress among adults16.2%14.2–18.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.1%15.6–20.6
Any disability among adults38.0%33.8–42.1
Hearing disability among adults10.0%8.8–11.1
Independent living disability among adults9.9%8.5–11.4
Mobility disability among adults15.9%13.8–18.1
Self-care disability among adults4.5%3.9–5.1
Vision disability among adults6.2%5.4–7.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.1%16.4–22.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.0%14.0–20.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.1%8.7–13.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.7%9.8–13.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.8–10.7
Loneliness among adults31.4%27.8–35.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.0–10.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283
Uninsured 18–6421.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281
No HS diploma (25+)6.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50528.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284
Unemployment rate (16+)5.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281
Households without a vehicle2.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283
Broadband subscription90.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283
Homeownership rate76.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283
Foreign-born population2.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284
Single-parent households37.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281
Population 65+14.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55315.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284
Median age31.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283
Median household income$68,269$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260
Median home value$393,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259
Median gross rent$1,392$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.7 yr ± 2.0678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.06 years of 81.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured