Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

84072

in Tabiona, UtahPopulation 539

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

46.23/ 100

Ranked #21,059 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #260 of 284 Utah ZIPs (bottom 8.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

60.9%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

1.5 days/year

in the bottom 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

9.9%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

25.8 mi

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

39.5 mi

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.98 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

26 mi

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

37.7 per million

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.8 pCi/L

in the top 13.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US86th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Tabiona, Utah (ZIP 84072) lands in the bottom 34% nationally (21,059th) and the bottom 8.5% of Utah (260th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Several serious readings shape the profile and deserve first mention: modeled mammography resides in the bottom 0.9% nationally, distance to a nursing home settles in the top 2.1% nationally, and distance to a community health center is in the top 2.2% nationally. Walkability sits in the bottom 2.6% nationally, distance to an emergency room lands in the top 2.8% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk lies in the top 8.0% nationally. Modeled fine-particle stands in the top 11.7% nationally. On the better side, modeled humid heat rests in the bottom 1.0% nationally, and binge drinking registers in the bottom 1.2% nationally. Households without a vehicle resides at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs.

Put simply, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. On the overall standing, ZIP 84021, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.3%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.1%29.9–36.5
High blood pressure among adults38.3%34.5–42.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%9.9–12.1
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.8%7.8–10.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.3%7.8–10.9
Depression among adults24.7%21.5–28.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.1%12.2–16.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.6%31.8–39.4
Obesity among adults32.1%26.5–38.0
Stroke among adults4.5%4.0–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.0%13.7–20.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.4%7.4–11.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.2%72.0–78.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.9%71.3–78.3
Cholesterol screening among adults82.2%79.9–84.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.0%58.9–68.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.7%56.9–64.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years60.9%52.0–69.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults9.9%8.1–12.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.9%9.7–14.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.8%21.5–30.5
Short sleep duration among adults31.0%25.7–36.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.8%18.5–25.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.1%15.0–19.3
Frequent physical distress among adults16.4%14.3–18.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.6%14.4–19.0
Any disability among adults34.2%29.8–38.7
Hearing disability among adults10.5%9.3–11.8
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.1–10.8
Mobility disability among adults16.7%14.2–19.3
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.0–5.3
Vision disability among adults5.8%5.0–6.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.9%16.7–23.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.8%11.1–16.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.0–11.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%7.8–11.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.3–8.7
Loneliness among adults28.9%24.5–33.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.0–8.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283
Uninsured 18–643.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281
No HS diploma (25+)6.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50528.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284
Unemployment rate (16+)7.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283
Broadband subscription92.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283
Homeownership rate85.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284
Single-parent households40.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281
Population 65+18.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55315.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284
Median age28.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283
Median household income$74,911$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260
Median home value$294,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259
Median gross rent$1,139$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.0 yr ± 0.9378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.93 years of 77.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured