Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

84063

in Randlett, UtahPopulation 322

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

38.52/ 100

Ranked #27,705 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 13.7%)

Ranked #276 of 284 Utah ZIPs (bottom 2.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

64%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

57.3%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

4.4 days/year

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

42.1%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

12.7%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

10.8%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST52nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

90.6 mi

in the top 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST70th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

25.8%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

6.8 ppb

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

US94th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Randlett, Utah (ZIP 84063) places in the bottom 13.7% nationally (27,705th) and the bottom 2.9% of Utah (276th).

continue reading

The data opens on real and measurable burdens: modeled mammography stands in the bottom 2.1% nationally, and home broadband subscription registers in the bottom 2.5% nationally. Poverty settles in the top 2.6% nationally, and crowded housing sits in the top 3.0% nationally. Modeled tooth loss lies in the top 6.3% nationally, modeled tree cover rests at the national minimum, and lead in tap water resides in the top 6.4% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled humid heat is in the bottom 2.6% nationally, modeled binge drinking lands in the bottom 2.6% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site stands in the top 4.2% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 84052, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Disability

healthier than 1%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.3%27.4–33.4
High blood pressure among adults36.3%32.8–39.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.1%7.3–8.9
Current asthma among adults12.9%11.4–14.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%7.0–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.2%7.1–9.5
Depression among adults26.5%23.3–30.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.0%13.1–17.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.8%31.3–38.5
Obesity among adults38.8%33.3–44.7
Stroke among adults4.4%4.0–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.8%21.5–30.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.5%10.3–15.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.2%69.0–75.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.5%67.7–74.9
Cholesterol screening among adults77.9%75.1–80.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.1%52.7–63.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.6%49.6–57.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years64.0%55.3–72.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.8%8.8–12.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.1%13.6–19.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.2%22.3–30.6
Short sleep duration among adults40.9%35.5–46.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.5%22.2–29.1
Frequent mental distress among adults19.9%17.8–22.3
Frequent physical distress among adults17.7%15.7–20.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.2%17.9–22.8
Any disability among adults42.3%37.9–47.1
Hearing disability among adults10.8%9.7–12.1
Independent living disability among adults11.5%10.1–13.1
Mobility disability among adults18.9%16.6–21.6
Self-care disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.7
Vision disability among adults7.9%7.0–8.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.0%21.6–28.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.1%20.3–27.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.1%11.5–16.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.6%14.1–19.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.7%10.9–14.4
Loneliness among adults34.5%30.3–39.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.5–14.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate42.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283
Uninsured 18–6418.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50528.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281
Households without a vehicle14.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283
Broadband subscription57.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283
Homeownership rate87.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283
Crowded housing (>1 per room)12.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284
Single-parent households54.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281
Population 65+21.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55315.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284
Median age45.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283
Median household income—$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260
Median home value$244,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259
Median gross rent—$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.6 yr ± 1.1078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.10 years of 78.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured