Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

84335

in Smithfield, UtahPopulation 16,210

62.17/ 100

Ranked #3,415 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 10.7%)

Ranked #42 of 284 Utah ZIPs (top 14.8%)

Ranked #9 of 22 Logan, UT-ID ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lead in tap water

36 ppb

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

US99th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

30%

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

25.7%

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.3%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

7.8%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.8%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

9.0%

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.2%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.4%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Smithfield, Utah (ZIP 84335) stands in the top 10.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,415th) and the top 14.8% of Utah (42nd).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: modeled high cholesterol registers in the bottom 3.4% nationally, and high blood pressure lies in the bottom 3.4% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease is in the bottom 4.6% nationally, and diabetes registers in the bottom 3.8% nationally. Modeled binge drinking lies in the bottom 5.8% nationally, mobility disability is in the bottom 5.6% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk registers in the bottom 8.1% nationally. Modeled stroke lies in the bottom 5.4% nationally. Working the other way, lead in tap water is in the top 0.3% nationally, and modeled fine-particle registers in the top 7.8% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, lead in tap water runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. ZIP 84318, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Logan, UT-ID metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.6%

11%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 25.1; chronic-disease standing 94.3 (top 10%) — 69 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,329 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.1%19.9–24.4
High blood pressure among adults25.7%23.2–28.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.9–8.2
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.2–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults4.3%3.9–4.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.4%3.8–5.0
Depression among adults26.5%23.6–29.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults7.8%6.9–8.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened30.0%27.1–33.0
Obesity among adults27.9%23.9–32.3
Stroke among adults2.4%2.1–2.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.3%6.6–10.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.1%6.8–9.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure65.9%62.8–68.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.1%66.8–73.2
Cholesterol screening among adults81.0%78.8–83.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.3%59.7–68.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.9%70.0–75.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.7%66.0–80.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.8%10.0–13.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.7%6.4–9.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults14.0%11.8–16.4
Short sleep duration among adults29.9%25.5–34.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.3%11.6–15.1
Frequent mental distress among adults16.0%14.2–17.9
Frequent physical distress among adults11.3%10.0–12.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.1%12.3–16.0
Any disability among adults25.3%22.2–28.4
Hearing disability among adults6.1%5.4–6.8
Independent living disability among adults6.2%5.4–7.0
Mobility disability among adults9.0%7.8–10.2
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.2–2.8
Vision disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.0%15.5–21.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.6–11.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.9%3.9–6.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.5–9.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.0–6.9
Loneliness among adults31.5%28.2–36.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.8–6.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283
Uninsured 18–647.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281
No HS diploma (25+)5.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284
Bachelor's or higher (25+)42.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50528.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284
Unemployment rate (16+)2.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281
Households without a vehicle1.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283
Broadband subscription96.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283
Homeownership rate80.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283
Foreign-born population4.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284
Single-parent households43.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281
Population 65+8.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55315.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284
Median age28.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283
Median household income$97,979$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260
Median home value$448,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259
Median gross rent$1,341$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.0 yr ± 1.1178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.11 years of 82.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured