ZIP code
84732
in Greenwich, UtahPopulation 21
44.78/ 100
Ranked #22,637 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 29%)
Ranked #268 of 284 Utah ZIPs (bottom 5.7%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Mammography
60.2%
in the bottom 0.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST4thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Industrial-pollution burden
in the bottom 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS1stDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
38.5%
in the bottom 0.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
32 mi
in the top 1.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST95thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
10.2%
in the bottom 1.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST35thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Distance to a Superfund site
135.9 mi
in the top 2.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST84thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Distance to a nursing home
22.4 mi
in the top 2.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST86thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.
Full methodology ›The read
Greenwich, Utah (ZIP 84732), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 29% nationally (22,637th) and the bottom 5.7% of Utah (268th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
The data opens on real and measurable burdens: modeled mammography resides in the bottom 0.8% nationally, and home broadband subscription is in the bottom 0.8% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lands in the top 2.7% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the bottom 0.8% nationally, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers in the top 1.7% nationally, and housing-cost burden settles at the national minimum. Modeled binge drinking sits in the bottom 1.6% nationally, distance to a Superfund site lies in the top 2.1% nationally, and poverty rests at the national minimum. Homeownership resides at the national maximum.
For anyone unfamiliar, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 84744, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
in the top 0.7%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 88%
11%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
in the top 0.00%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 17%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 37%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 13%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 22%
8%
Disability
healthier than 17%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 3%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 95%
14%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
in the top 0.00%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 41%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 42%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
in the bottom 0.00%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 5%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 19%
11%
Disability
healthier than 3%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 7%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
84744
Utahshares a border
Score 57.48
Closest healthier
84701
Utahabout 2.0 mi away
Score 54.89
Similar health profile
83312
Idaho97% similar profile
Score 47.22
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 34.9% | 30.9–38.8 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 39.7% | 35.1–44.4 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 11.4% | 10.2–12.6 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.7% | 10.2–13.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 9.5% | 8.0–11.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 10.6% | 8.2–13.2 |
| Depression among adults | 26.8% | 22.8–31.3 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 14.4% | 12.0–17.0 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 39.3% | 34.6–44.2 |
| Obesity among adults | 33.4% | 25.3–42.0 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.0% | 4.1–5.9 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 22.3% | 18.5–26.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 10.8% | 6.6–17.0 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 75.7% | 72.4–78.9 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 74.3% | 70.0–78.1 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 81.3% | 76.9–84.9 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 70.0% | 63.7–75.2 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 60.0% | 56.3–63.3 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 60.2% | 49.5–69.0 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 10.2% | 8.1–12.6 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 13.9% | 10.1–18.4 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 24.6% | 19.0–31.0 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 34.3% | 27.1–40.9 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 23.9% | 18.8–30.0 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.6% | 14.9–20.4 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 17.7% | 14.7–21.1 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 17.8% | 14.3–22.1 |
| Any disability among adults | 38.9% | 32.4–46.4 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 11.5% | 9.8–13.3 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 10.5% | 8.3–12.9 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 19.5% | 15.6–23.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.2% | 4.1–6.4 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.4% | 5.1–7.9 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 20.4% | 16.2–24.9 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 16.1% | 11.3–21.9 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 11.2% | 7.5–15.7 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.6% | 7.7–13.8 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 8.4% | 6.4–10.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 32.3% | 26.3–38.5 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 8.1% | 6.2–10.2 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | UT median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 7.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | — | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 10.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 4.8% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 5.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 0.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 28.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | — | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 2.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283 |
| Broadband subscription | 38.5% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 0.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 81.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 2.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 3.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284 |
| Single-parent households | 100.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 49.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281 |
| Population 65+ | 100.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 15.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284 |
| Median age | 80.6 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 35.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | UT median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 77.4 yr ± 0.86 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.86 years of 77.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured