Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

84021

in Duchesne, UtahPopulation 3,069

48.16/ 100

Ranked #18,731 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #250 of 284 Utah ZIPs (bottom 12.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

61%

in the bottom 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

1.4 days/year

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

10.4%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST41st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.97%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST48th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.8 pCi/L

in the top 13.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US86th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

29.3 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 14.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Duchesne, Utah (ZIP 84021) lands in the bottom 42% nationally (18,731st) and the bottom 12.0% of Utah (250th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

This area's pressures are easy to read across the measures: modeled mammography lands in the bottom 1.0% nationally, modeled fine-particle lies in the top 9.7% nationally, and distance to a nursing home stands in the top 10.6% nationally. Walkability rests in the bottom 11.7% nationally, modeled radon registers in the top 13.6% nationally, and crowded housing resides in the top 12.0% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled humid heat settles in the bottom 0.9% nationally, and binge drinking is in the bottom 1.9% nationally. Households without a vehicle sits at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Distance to a Superfund site lands in the top 10.7% nationally.

Put simply, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. On the overall standing, ZIP 84001, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.1%27.0–33.3
High blood pressure among adults35.6%31.8–39.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.7–10.6
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.1–8.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.2%7.2–9.4
Depression among adults24.9%21.6–28.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%11.3–14.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.2%29.4–37.0
Obesity among adults32.4%26.7–38.1
Stroke among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.5%14.2–21.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.7%8.9–12.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.6%69.1–75.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.5%69.6–77.0
Cholesterol screening among adults81.5%79.2–83.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.8%54.7–64.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.7%57.9–65.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years61.0%52.0–69.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.4%8.4–12.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.1%10.1–14.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.7%21.5–29.9
Short sleep duration among adults31.2%25.9–36.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.4%18.5–24.3
Frequent mental distress among adults17.7%15.6–19.8
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%14.0–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.1%15.0–19.2
Any disability among adults33.2%29.1–37.5
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.8–11.0
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.2–10.6
Mobility disability among adults15.5%13.4–17.8
Self-care disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.0
Vision disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.6%17.5–23.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.0%12.5–17.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.6%7.9–11.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.2–12.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.9–9.2
Loneliness among adults29.5%25.2–34.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.8–9.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283
Uninsured 18–6413.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281
No HS diploma (25+)6.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50528.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284
Unemployment rate (16+)2.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283
Broadband subscription90.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283
Homeownership rate86.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283
Foreign-born population3.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284
Single-parent households51.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281
Population 65+16.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55315.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284
Median age36.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283
Median household income$73,819$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260
Median home value$271,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259
Median gross rent$1,064$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.3 yr ± 2.0078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.00 years of 84.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured