Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

84772

in Summit, UtahPopulation 104

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

48.88/ 100

Ranked #17,822 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #244 of 284 Utah ZIPs (bottom 14.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

8.8%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

182.5 mi

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

3.1 days/year

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

64.6%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.9%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

The read

Summit, Utah (ZIP 84772), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 44% nationally (17,822nd) and the bottom 14.1% of Utah (244th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The data points to real strain across a number of measures here: home broadband subscription stands in the bottom 4.0% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise lands in the top 4.1% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled binge drinking is in the bottom 0.4% nationally, distance to a Superfund site resides in the top 1.3% nationally, and modeled humid heat rests in the bottom 1.9% nationally. Housing-cost burden lies at the national minimum, and poverty sits at the national minimum. Modeled expected annual loss settles in the bottom 2.6% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk registers in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the bottom 4.0% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 84761, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.3%30.6–37.7
High blood pressure among adults37.6%33.6–41.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%9.9–12.2
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.3–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults9.0%7.9–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.1%7.4–10.9
Depression among adults26.8%23.2–30.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.2%12.1–16.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.3%35.1–43.5
Obesity among adults37.8%31.7–43.9
Stroke among adults4.7%4.0–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.5%16.9–24.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.0%6.8–11.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.1%72.6–79.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.0%73.6–80.1
Cholesterol screening among adults83.3%80.7–85.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.8%54.4–64.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.6%60.9–68.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.6%58.6–75.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults8.8%7.2–10.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.6%9.1–14.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.1%18.5–27.8
Short sleep duration among adults32.3%27.1–37.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.5%18.6–26.3
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%14.9–19.5
Frequent physical distress among adults17.2%14.7–19.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.2%14.4–19.8
Any disability among adults38.0%32.5–42.8
Hearing disability among adults11.0%9.6–12.4
Independent living disability among adults10.2%8.5–11.9
Mobility disability among adults19.0%15.7–22.0
Self-care disability among adults5.0%4.2–5.9
Vision disability among adults6.5%5.4–7.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.6%16.3–23.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.8%11.5–18.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.5%7.1–12.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.4–12.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.6–9.7
Loneliness among adults30.9%26.3–35.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.3–9.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284
Bachelor's or higher (25+)37.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50528.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283
Broadband subscription64.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283
Homeownership rate64.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284
Single-parent households64.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55315.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284
Median age54.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283
Median household income—$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260
Median home value—$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259
Median gross rent—$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.9 yr ± 0.9878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.98 years of 78.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured