Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

84014

in Centerville, UtahPopulation 16,679

62.76/ 100

Ranked #3,099 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.7%)

Ranked #34 of 284 Utah ZIPs (top 12.0%)

Ranked #5 of 22 Ogden, UT ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

10.1%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST33rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Park land

55%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

9.2%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.1%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.3%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.6%

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.8%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.4%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.5%

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

97.1%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Centerville, Utah (ZIP 84014) sits in the top 9.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,099th) and the top 12.0% of Utah (34th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: modeled binge drinking settles in the bottom 1.4% nationally, park land stands in the top 2.0% nationally, and modeled food insecurity is in the bottom 4.7% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity rests in the bottom 4.9% nationally, transportation sits in the bottom 5.9% nationally, and utility shutoff registers in the bottom 6.6% nationally. Modeled energy burden lands in the bottom 4.5% nationally, and fiber broadband resides in the top 8.1% nationally. On the other hand, outer-floodplain exposure lies in the top 4.1% nationally, and modeled fine-particle settles in the top 4.4% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. ZIP 84050, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Ogden, UT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.5%

11%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.1 ± 2.1 years. A median household income of $123,130 predicts 80.9 years — 2.2 years above.

    Ranked #795 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.1 ± 2.1 years. The 45 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.7 years — 4.5 years above them.

    Ranked #225 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 11.3; chronic-disease standing 87.0 — 76 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,894 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.3%21.9–26.6
High blood pressure among adults29.0%26.2–31.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.4–10.0
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.7–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults5.1%4.5–5.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.4%3.8–5.0
Depression among adults28.4%25.3–31.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.6%7.5–9.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.5%29.6–35.5
Obesity among adults31.3%27.2–35.4
Stroke among adults2.6%2.3–2.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.8%5.5–8.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.8%5.7–8.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure70.1%66.9–73.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.6%72.7–78.3
Cholesterol screening among adults85.0%83.1–86.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.5%65.8–72.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults76.5%74.0–78.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.4%64.7–77.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.1%8.4–11.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults6.3%5.3–7.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults15.5%13.1–17.9
Short sleep duration among adults32.5%28.8–36.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.1%11.4–14.9
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%13.9–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults10.7%9.4–12.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.9%11.3–14.5
Any disability among adults26.2%23.3–29.3
Hearing disability among adults6.7%6.0–7.5
Independent living disability among adults5.8%5.1–6.6
Mobility disability among adults9.4%8.1–10.8
Self-care disability among adults2.4%2.1–2.7
Vision disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.0%14.9–19.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.0–8.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults3.7%3.0–4.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.6–7.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.2–5.5
Loneliness among adults30.7%27.5–33.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.4%3.8–5.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283
Uninsured 18–647.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281
No HS diploma (25+)2.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284
Bachelor's or higher (25+)51.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50528.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281
Households without a vehicle0.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283
Broadband subscription94.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283
Homeownership rate88.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283
Foreign-born population3.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284
Single-parent households54.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281
Population 65+19.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55315.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284
Median age39.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283
Median household income$123,130$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260
Median home value$531,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259
Median gross rent$1,918$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.1 yr ± 1.0978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.09 years of 83.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured