Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

84118

in West Valley City, UtahPopulation 42,853

48.92/ 100

Ranked #17,772 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranked #242 of 284 Utah ZIPs (bottom 14.8%)

Ranked #35 of 43 Salt Lake City-Murray, UT ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US98th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

19.5%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

29.6%

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.7%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

39.4%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

26.7%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.3%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 84118, one of several in West Valley City, Utah, on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 45% nationally (17,772nd) and the bottom 14.8% of Utah (242nd).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: modeled high cholesterol settles in the bottom 3.0% nationally, high blood pressure stands in the bottom 4.4% nationally, and coronary heart disease is in the bottom 4.6% nationally. On the other hand, modeled expected annual loss rests in the top 2.3% nationally, uninsured sits in the top 4.9% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden registers in the top 3.2% nationally. Modeled tree cover lands at the national minimum, and fine-particle resides in the top 5.3% nationally. Modeled loneliness lies in the top 5.3% nationally, and colon screening settles in the bottom 7.4% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, outer-floodplain exposure runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 84081, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Salt Lake City-Murray, UT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.2 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $90,562 predicts 79.7 years — 2.5 years below.

    Ranked #3,442 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 7.0 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 91.0 (top 10%) — 84 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,493 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.5%17.9–21.1
High blood pressure among adults26.7%24.7–28.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.3%4.9–5.8
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.1–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults4.3%3.9–4.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.8%4.3–5.3
Depression among adults27.8%25.4–30.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.4%8.4–10.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened29.6%27.4–31.9
Obesity among adults32.7%29.3–36.1
Stroke among adults2.5%2.4–2.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.9%12.5–17.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.5%17.5–21.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure62.0%59.1–64.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults65.9%63.1–68.6
Cholesterol screening among adults77.4%75.4–79.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.0%53.6–60.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.5%57.8–63.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.0%64.7–75.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%13.6–17.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.4%9.1–11.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.0%21.6–26.5
Short sleep duration among adults38.0%34.7–41.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.0%19.3–22.8
Frequent mental distress among adults19.6%17.9–21.3
Frequent physical distress among adults14.5%13.2–15.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.5%16.9–20.1
Any disability among adults32.5%29.9–35.0
Hearing disability among adults6.0%5.4–6.6
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.4–8.9
Mobility disability among adults12.2%11.0–13.3
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.2–3.7
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.2–6.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.2%24.8–29.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.9%19.9–24.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.6–11.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.0%15.3–18.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.2%9.1–11.3
Loneliness among adults39.4%36.6–42.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.6–10.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283
Uninsured 18–6421.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281
No HS diploma (25+)20.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50528.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284
Unemployment rate (16+)6.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281
Households without a vehicle2.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283
Broadband subscription95.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283
Homeownership rate84.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283
Foreign-born population18.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284
Single-parent households42.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281
Population 65+8.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55315.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284
Median age32.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283
Median household income$90,562$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260
Median home value$389,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259
Median gross rent$1,768$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.2 yr ± 0.7778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.77 years of 77.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured