Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

84621

in Axtell, UtahPopulation 124

45.80/ 100

Ranked #21,545 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranked #262 of 284 Utah ZIPs (bottom 7.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

10.0%

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST31st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

65.2%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

97.3 mi

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST73rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

56.1%

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

Axtell, Utah (ZIP 84621), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 33% nationally (21,545th) and the bottom 7.8% of Utah (262nd).

continue reading

The data points to real strain across a number of measures here: modeled mammography settles in the bottom 3.1% nationally, tree cover registers at the national minimum, and colon screening stands in the bottom 6.1% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled binge drinking lands in the bottom 1.3% nationally, housing-cost burden is at the national minimum, and poverty resides at the national minimum. Homeownership rests at the national maximum, and home broadband subscription lies at the national maximum. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk sits in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site settles in the top 3.8% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 84642, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 84%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.4%29.0–35.8
High blood pressure among adults36.2%32.4–39.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.8–11.0
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.0–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%7.9–10.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.7%7.9–11.6
Depression among adults26.2%22.7–29.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.2%12.2–16.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.9%31.9–39.9
Obesity among adults32.2%26.5–38.3
Stroke among adults4.7%4.0–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.4%15.9–23.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.9%9.8–16.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.7%70.2–76.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.6%68.7–76.4
Cholesterol screening among adults80.3%77.3–83.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.1%51.1–61.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.9%60.2–67.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years65.2%56.2–73.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.0%8.1–12.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.3%11.5–17.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.5%20.8–30.1
Short sleep duration among adults37.2%31.7–43.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.4%19.5–27.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.0%15.9–20.3
Frequent physical distress among adults17.3%15.0–19.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.5%15.8–21.3
Any disability among adults38.6%33.5–43.4
Hearing disability among adults11.5%10.0–12.9
Independent living disability among adults10.4%8.8–12.1
Mobility disability among adults18.1%15.2–21.2
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.4–6.3
Vision disability among adults6.7%5.6–7.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.7%17.3–24.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.8%13.9–22.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.6%8.7–15.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.7%10.3–15.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.4–10.7
Loneliness among adults31.5%27.0–36.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.6–10.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50528.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284
Single-parent households28.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55315.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284
Median age33.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.6 yr ± 0.7978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.79 years of 76.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured