Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

84328

in Paradise, UtahPopulation 1,681

63.05/ 100

Ranked #2,942 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.2%)

Ranked #30 of 284 Utah ZIPs (top 10.6%)

Ranked #5 of 22 Logan, UT-ID ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

10.5%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST44th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

9.6 ppb

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

US96th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

27.9%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.5%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.9%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10.1 per million

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST47th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.8%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97.9%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.1%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.55 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Paradise, Utah (ZIP 84328), overall, ranks in the top 9.2% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,942nd) and the top 10.6% of Utah (30th).

continue reading

This area's most favorable readings come through plainly in the numbers: modeled binge drinking registers in the bottom 2.1% nationally, short sleep resides in the bottom 2.9% nationally, and housing insecurity settles in the bottom 4.4% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is in the bottom 5.2% nationally, modeled food insecurity sits in the bottom 6.6% nationally, and home broadband subscription lands in the top 7.8% nationally. Modeled transportation lies in the bottom 8.7% nationally, and childcare stands in the top 8.8% nationally. On the other side, lead in tap water rests in the top 3.7% nationally, and modeled fine-particle registers in the top 5.0% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. ZIP 84326, about 3.0 miles away, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Logan, UT-ID metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.2%

11%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.00%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.7%25.2–30.3
High blood pressure among adults31.0%28.2–34.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.2–10.8
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.2–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.7–6.1
Depression among adults25.5%22.8–28.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.6%8.4–10.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.4%31.4–37.7
Obesity among adults28.1%24.2–32.6
Stroke among adults3.0%2.7–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.5%7.6–11.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%5.6–7.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.0%68.9–74.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.6%70.6–76.3
Cholesterol screening among adults84.3%82.5–85.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.0%64.4–73.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults77.0%74.3–79.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.4%69.3–82.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.5%8.9–12.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.8%6.5–9.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults14.7%12.3–17.3
Short sleep duration among adults27.9%23.6–32.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.8%12.0–15.8
Frequent mental distress among adults14.8%13.2–16.5
Frequent physical distress among adults12.3%10.9–13.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.1%11.6–14.8
Any disability among adults27.0%24.0–30.3
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.9–8.6
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.5–7.1
Mobility disability among adults10.9%9.5–12.4
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.1%14.9–20.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.5–9.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.2%3.4–5.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.5–7.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.4–5.9
Loneliness among adults29.8%26.5–34.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.9%4.2–5.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283
Uninsured 18–645.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281
No HS diploma (25+)1.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284
Bachelor's or higher (25+)48.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50528.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284
Unemployment rate (16+)4.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281
Households without a vehicle0.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283
Broadband subscription97.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283
Homeownership rate94.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283
Foreign-born population2.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284
Single-parent households66.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281
Population 65+20.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55315.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284
Median age41.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283
Median household income$113,646$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260
Median home value$586,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259
Median gross rent$1,383$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.9 yr ± 2.2878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.28 years of 82.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured