Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

84093

in Sandy, UtahPopulation 23,871

62.98/ 100

Ranked #2,981 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.3%)

Ranked #32 of 284 Utah ZIPs (top 11.3%)

Ranked #5 of 43 Salt Lake City-Murray, UT ZIPs (top 11.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$138,556

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

1.3 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.6%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US94th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.8%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.3%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

10.2 days/year

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST52nd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.0%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, ZIP 84093, one of several in Sandy, Utah lands in the top 9.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,981st) and the top 11.3% of Utah (32nd).

continue reading

This area's strengths are easy to pick out across the measures: household income lands in the top 5.4% nationally, fatal road crashes lies in the bottom 5.0% nationally, and modeled transportation stands in the bottom 5.9% nationally. Modeled energy burden rests in the bottom 2.9% nationally, humid heat registers in the bottom 7.3% nationally, and housing insecurity resides in the bottom 7.4% nationally. Working the other way, modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the top 3.7% nationally, and tree cover is at the national minimum. Modeled fine-particle sits in the top 5.6% nationally, and expected annual loss lands in the top 5.7% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, expected annual loss runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. On the overall standing, ZIP 84092, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Salt Lake City-Murray, UT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 97%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 17.5; chronic-disease standing 84.2 — 67 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,092 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.9%23.9–27.9
High blood pressure among adults31.0%28.7–33.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.2–10.8
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.7–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.6%4.1–5.2
Depression among adults26.9%24.5–29.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.8%7.9–9.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.6%32.1–37.0
Obesity among adults27.7%24.6–30.9
Stroke among adults2.7%2.5–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.4%6.1–8.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.8%5.9–7.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.7%68.9–74.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.6%71.3–75.9
Cholesterol screening among adults86.6%85.3–87.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.9%69.1–74.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults75.8%73.7–77.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.7%69.8–79.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.4%12.7–16.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults6.8%5.8–7.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults15.6%13.7–17.5
Short sleep duration among adults31.6%28.8–34.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.5%12.1–15.0
Frequent mental distress among adults15.0%13.6–16.4
Frequent physical distress among adults11.9%10.8–13.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.8%10.6–13.0
Any disability among adults26.0%23.6–28.3
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.6
Independent living disability among adults5.5%5.0–6.2
Mobility disability among adults10.6%9.5–11.9
Self-care disability among adults2.4%2.2–2.7
Vision disability among adults3.3%3.0–3.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.5%17.5–21.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.4–9.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults3.7%3.1–4.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.1–7.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.3–5.4
Loneliness among adults32.2%29.6–34.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.1–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283
Uninsured 18–644.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281
No HS diploma (25+)2.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284
Bachelor's or higher (25+)53.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50528.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281
Households without a vehicle0.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283
Broadband subscription96.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283
Homeownership rate92.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283
Foreign-born population5.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284
Single-parent households53.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281
Population 65+19.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55315.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284
Median age40.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283
Median household income$138,556$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260
Median home value$698,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259
Median gross rent$2,108$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.0 yr ± 0.8378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.83 years of 81.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured