Skip to main content
ZipVitals

How the Birmingham, AL metro's ZIP codes measure up on health

The ZipVitals Score across the Birmingham, AL metro area — built one ZIP code at a time, then rolled up by resident population.

Data release 2026116 of 116 ZIP codes scored · 1.2M residents represented

Score snapshot

50.75Metro-wide ZipVitals Scorepopulation-weighted average of its ZIP codes
46.17Median scoremiddle of 116 scored ZIPs
70.98Highest score35223 · Mountain Brook
22.32Lowest score35234 · Birmingham
48.66Spreadpoints between highest & lowest ZIP

People & national context

#208Among 386 metrosby population-weighted average
59%Residents in below-average ZIPs0.70M of 1.2M, in ZIPs scoring under the national average (53.48)
0.72MResidents in the top 50 ZIPs60% of the metro
0.34MResidents in the bottom 50 ZIPs28% of the metro
0ZIPs in the national top 100

The Birmingham, AL metro's ZIP codes, ranked

Highest-scoring

Top 50 of 116
  1. 41935223in Mountain Brook · 10,666 residents70.98
  2. 72435213in Mountain Brook · 15,603 residents69.22
  3. 1,38535243in Vestavia Hills · 18,176 residents66.66
  4. 1,73035226in Hoover · 38,588 residents65.72
  5. 1,86635242in Hoover · 57,374 residents65.35
  6. 2,59935244in Hoover · 38,217 residents63.74
  7. 3,63635080in Helena · 20,251 residents61.80
  8. 4,37935209in Homewood · 32,734 residents60.63
  9. 4,56035173in Trussville · 31,603 residents60.38
  10. 4,61235124in Pelham · 25,238 residents60.33
  11. 4,74135043in Chelsea · 15,837 residents60.17
  12. 5,04435229in Homewood · 2,792 residents59.74
  13. 5,54535233in Birmingham · 3,570 residents59.07
  14. 5,54835210in Irondale · 13,775 residents59.07
  15. 5,72535216in Vestavia Hills · 34,327 residents58.83
  16. 5,98835222in Birmingham · 8,361 residents58.51
  17. 6,01035007in Alabaster · 28,586 residents58.47
  18. 6,08535205in Birmingham · 18,858 residents58.38
  19. 7,08035114in Maylene · 7,922 residents57.20
  20. 8,12535091in Kimberly · 3,802 residents56.14
  21. 8,23235022in Bessemer · 23,126 residents56.04
  22. 8,99735071in Gardendale · 17,288 residents55.38
  23. 9,05135116in Morris · 5,227 residents55.34
  24. 9,09735147in Sterrett · 6,897 residents55.30
  25. 9,69935112in Margaret · 120 residents54.80
  26. 11,28235068in Fultondale · 8,378 residents53.56
  27. 11,32235117in Mount Olive · 5,606 residents53.53
  28. 11,51235111in Mc Calla · 20,342 residents53.39
  29. 11,99135040in Calera · 19,304 residents53.06
  30. 13,59935146in Springville · 13,973 residents51.89
  31. 14,01735186in Wilsonville · 5,191 residents51.58
  32. 14,05835051in Columbiana · 9,818 residents51.54
  33. 14,18335094in Leeds · 14,854 residents51.46
  34. 14,34235254in Birmingham · 1,749 residents51.36
  35. 14,87735118in Sylvan Springs · 2,960 residents50.98
  36. 14,92235127in Pleasant Grove · 9,442 residents50.95
  37. 15,03735004in Moody · 12,155 residents50.88
  38. 15,65235171in Thorsby · 3,595 residents50.43
  39. 16,49635143in Shelby · 3,146 residents49.82
  40. 17,20335126in Pinson · 22,599 residents49.32
  41. 17,50935120in Odenville · 17,730 residents49.11
  42. 17,73935006in North Johns · 3,894 residents48.95
  43. 17,76535235in Birmingham · 20,526 residents48.93
  44. 17,84235180in Warrior · 12,973 residents48.86
  45. 19,00635031in Blountsville · 7,973 residents47.93
  46. 19,40835054in Cropwell · 4,593 residents47.63
  47. 19,41735062in Dora · 8,864 residents47.63
  48. 19,80535060in Docena · 158 residents47.29
  49. 19,87335128in Pell City · 10,546 residents47.24
  50. 19,89435036in Brookside · 208 residents47.22
Open the full Birmingham, AL metro ranking →One page, all 116 scored ZIPs — sortable by score, residents, or place

Where each domain sits inside this metro

The Score above is one number for the whole Birmingham, AL metro. Nine domains make it up, and they are not spread the same way across the people who live here. Each row divides this metro's ZIP codes into fifths by how they stand against each other on that domain, then counts who lives at each end. If a domain were spread evenly across the metro's residents, every row would read about 20%.

The highest-standing fifth

23 of 114 ZIPs

Share of the metro's residents living in the fifth of its ZIP codes that stand highest on each domain.

Risk Behavior39%462,137 people

Standing highest: 35052 Cook Springs35213 Mountain Brook35223 Mountain Brook

Social Need / SDOH38%449,051 people

Standing highest: 35213 Mountain Brook35223 Mountain Brook35243 Vestavia Hills

Chronic Disease Burden37%442,056 people

Standing highest: 35229 Homewood35233 Birmingham35254 Birmingham

Disability37%440,575 people

Standing highest: 35213 Mountain Brook35223 Mountain Brook35243 Vestavia Hills

Mental Health34%400,222 people

Standing highest: 35052 Cook Springs35223 Mountain Brook35242 Hoover

Healthcare Access31%368,164 people

5 ZIP codes tie at this end: 35007 Alabaster35022 Bessemer35042 Centreville35045 Clanton35211 Birmingham

Preventive Care30%355,764 people

Standing highest: 35052 Cook Springs35213 Mountain Brook35223 Mountain Brook

Climate / Disaster Risk18%218,602 people

Standing highest: 35013 Allgood35203 Birmingham35233 Birmingham

Environmental Hazard8%98,694 people

Standing highest: 35034 Brent35587 Townley36793 Lawley

Each fifth is about 23 of this metro’s 114 compared ZIP codes, and the shares are out of 1,189,802 residents. A ZIP code is compared here only if it carries a resident count to weight it by and enough measured data on that domain — the rest are left out of that domain’s fifths rather than filled in from a coarser geography, which is why this count can sit just below the metro’s scored total.

The mark shows 20% — where a row would sit if that domain were spread evenly across the metro's residents.

Each ZIP code is compared with the other ZIP codes in this metro that are measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain.

Why this matters

The ZipVitals Score combines nine domains of health — from chronic disease and preventive care to environmental hazard, social need, and healthcare access — into one 0–100 index for each ZIP code, computed the same way everywhere from public federal and academic data. The Birmingham, AL figures on this page are population-weighted rollups of those per-ZIP scores, so they describe the metro's residents rather than a coarser geography relabeled as the metro.

A high score describes favorable documented conditions; it is not a claim about individual residents, and it does not capture everything that shapes a community's health. Where a ZIP code scores low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.