Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

35206

in Birmingham, AlabamaPopulation 15,621

35.98/ 100

Ranked #29,007 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 9.6%)

Ranked #512 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #105 of 116 Birmingham, AL ZIPs (bottom 9.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Diabetes

21.3%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.8%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

50.7%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

19.7%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

40.9%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.8%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

44.4%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

35.8%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.6%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, ZIP 35206, one of several in Birmingham, Alabama lands in the bottom 9.6% nationally (29,007th) and the bottom 17% of Alabama (512th).

continue reading

The measures that press hardest set the tone here: modeled diabetes is in the top 2.2% nationally, and self-care disability stands in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the top 2.5% nationally, and high blood pressure lies in the top 2.8% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff resides in the top 2.7% nationally, loneliness lands in the top 2.9% nationally, and vision disability registers in the top 5.3% nationally. Modeled short sleep sits in the top 3.9% nationally, food insecurity rests in the top 3.3% nationally, and independent living disability is in the top 5.0% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 35210, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Birmingham, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.4 ± 2.2 years. A median household income of $42,549 predicts 76.7 years — 4.3 years below.

    Ranked #5,211 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 72.4 ± 2.2 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.3%28.6–34.2
High blood pressure among adults50.7%47.3–54.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.0%5.5–6.7
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.3–8.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.7%8.7–10.8
Depression among adults22.1%19.4–25.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults21.3%19.2–23.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.9%37.5–44.3
Obesity among adults45.4%40.7–50.2
Stroke among adults5.9%5.4–6.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.5%21.7–29.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.0%11.3–15.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.9%77.6–82.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.6%80.0–85.0
Cholesterol screening among adults85.7%83.9–87.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.0%64.0–71.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults45.5%41.9–49.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.7%76.7–86.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.0%10.1–14.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.8%17.4–22.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults37.7%33.9–41.7
Short sleep duration among adults44.4%39.9–48.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults30.3%27.5–33.3
Frequent mental distress among adults19.1%17.2–21.3
Frequent physical distress among adults16.0%14.3–17.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.4%17.4–21.5
Any disability among adults42.8%39.1–46.6
Hearing disability among adults7.2%6.4–8.0
Independent living disability among adults13.6%12.3–15.0
Mobility disability among adults23.5%21.3–25.9
Self-care disability among adults7.8%7.1–8.5
Vision disability among adults9.8%9.0–10.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.2%26.0–32.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults35.8%32.7–39.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults31.9%28.8–35.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.3%22.6–28.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults17.2%15.4–19.1
Loneliness among adults40.9%37.0–45.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults19.7%17.6–22.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6425.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)12.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)10.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle10.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription87.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate48.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population4.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households32.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+17.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age42.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$42,549$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$153,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$1,024$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.4 yr ± 1.1078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.10 years of 72.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured