Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

35064

in Fairfield, AlabamaPopulation 9,872

38.73/ 100

Ranked #27,574 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 14.1%)

Ranked #438 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranked #96 of 116 Birmingham, AL ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Diabetes

22.8%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

53.5%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

85.4%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

42.5%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.3%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

45.5%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.5%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

10.3%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

210 intersections/sq mi

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Fairfield, Alabama (ZIP 35064), overall, ranks in the bottom 14.1% nationally (27,574th) and the bottom 29% of Alabama (438th).

continue reading

Several serious readings shape the profile and deserve first mention: modeled diabetes resides in the top 1.2% nationally, high blood pressure settles in the top 1.3% nationally, and loneliness is in the top 1.6% nationally. Modeled stroke sits in the top 2.8% nationally, short sleep lands in the top 2.5% nationally, and self-care disability lies in the top 4.1% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk stands in the top 2.4% nationally. On the better side, modeled mammography rests in the top 0.5% nationally, and binge drinking registers in the bottom 1.7% nationally. Walkability resides in the top 2.4% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. ZIP 35061, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Birmingham, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 1%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.2 ± 2.2 years. A median household income of $48,692 predicts 77.2 years — 5.0 years below.

    Ranked #5,541 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 72.2 ± 2.2 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.8%29.1–34.7
High blood pressure among adults53.5%50.3–56.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.5%4.9–6.0
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.3–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.1–8.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.8%7.7–10.0
Depression among adults20.1%17.6–23.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults22.8%20.5–25.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.3%37.1–43.6
Obesity among adults46.5%41.8–51.5
Stroke among adults6.3%5.7–6.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years23.1%19.1–27.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.9%9.0–12.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.1%79.0–83.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.9%82.5–87.1
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.4–88.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.8%67.8–75.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.6%45.7–53.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years85.4%80.8–89.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.3%8.7–12.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.1%14.7–19.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults37.6%33.5–42.1
Short sleep duration among adults45.5%41.0–50.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.7%26.6–33.0
Frequent mental distress among adults18.8%16.7–21.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.3–16.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.5%16.4–20.9
Any disability among adults43.2%39.3–47.3
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.2
Independent living disability among adults13.4%11.8–15.0
Mobility disability among adults24.0%21.4–26.6
Self-care disability among adults7.5%6.8–8.3
Vision disability among adults9.7%8.7–10.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.8%27.4–34.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults36.5%32.5–41.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults31.5%27.5–35.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.6%22.7–29.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults17.6%15.6–19.9
Loneliness among adults42.5%38.7–46.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults19.8%17.6–22.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate31.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–649.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)6.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)6.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle14.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription84.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)37.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate59.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households37.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+18.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age30.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$48,692$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$129,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$1,008$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.2 yr ± 1.1078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.10 years of 72.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured