Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

35215

in Birmingham, AlabamaPopulation 43,903

40.12/ 100

Ranked #26,680 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #399 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranked #90 of 116 Birmingham, AL ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

1,459 units

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

42.5%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

20%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

44.7%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

26.4%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

35.8%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

17.4%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 35215, one of several in Birmingham, Alabama lands in the bottom 17% nationally (26,680th) and the bottom 36% of Alabama (399th).

continue reading

A number of measures mark where this area is under strain: modeled loneliness registers in the top 1.6% nationally, and utility shutoff rests in the top 2.6% nationally. Modeled short sleep stands in the top 3.5% nationally, and housing insecurity lies in the top 3.2% nationally. Modeled food insecurity lands in the top 3.3% nationally, transportation sits in the top 3.8% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk is in the top 4.5% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss settles in the top 4.8% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water resides at the national maximum. On the brighter side, subsidized affordable housing registers in the top 0.7% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, subsidized affordable housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 35071, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Birmingham, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.5 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $52,793 predicts 77.6 years — 4.0 years below.

    Ranked #5,079 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 73.5 ± 1.4 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.5%26.0–31.3
High blood pressure among adults47.8%44.5–51.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.4%4.9–6.0
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.1–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.3–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.5%7.7–9.4
Depression among adults22.5%19.7–25.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.7%16.8–20.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.1%34.9–41.4
Obesity among adults45.3%40.7–50.1
Stroke among adults5.0%4.7–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.8%19.1–26.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.9%11.2–14.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.2%74.6–79.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.0%79.3–84.6
Cholesterol screening among adults84.7%82.8–86.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.6%62.4–70.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults47.6%43.8–51.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.0%76.8–86.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.2%10.2–14.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.7%16.6–21.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.5%32.8–40.5
Short sleep duration among adults44.7%40.3–49.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.7%26.1–31.6
Frequent mental distress among adults20.0%18.0–22.2
Frequent physical distress among adults15.1%13.5–16.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.8%17.9–21.9
Any disability among adults41.8%38.2–45.6
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.9–7.3
Independent living disability among adults13.1%11.9–14.4
Mobility disability among adults21.1%19.1–23.3
Self-care disability among adults6.8%6.3–7.4
Vision disability among adults8.9%8.2–9.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.1%26.9–33.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults35.8%32.4–39.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults30.5%27.5–33.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.4%23.6–29.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults17.4%15.6–19.2
Loneliness among adults42.5%38.7–46.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults20.0%17.8–22.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6419.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)10.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)7.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle7.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription91.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate56.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population4.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households37.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+12.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age35.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$52,793$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$157,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$1,148$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.5 yr ± 0.7178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.71 years of 73.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured