Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

35080

in Helena, AlabamaPopulation 20,251

61.80/ 100

Ranked #3,636 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 11.4%)

Ranked #14 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (top 2.3%)

Ranked #7 of 116 Birmingham, AL ZIPs (top 6.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.3%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

39.9 per million

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.3%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

2.7%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

10 µg/L

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

9.7%

in the bottom 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Helena, Alabama (ZIP 35080) comes out in the top 11.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,636th) and the top 2.3% of Alabama (14th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: modeled coronary heart disease is in the bottom 4.6% nationally, modeled stroke resides in the bottom 4.3% nationally, and poverty rests in the bottom 8.6% nationally. Lithium in drinking water lies in the bottom 9.7% nationally, and modeled mobility disability sits in the bottom 8.0% nationally. By contrast, PFOA in drinking water settles at the national maximum, and PFOS in drinking water registers at the national maximum. PFAS in drinking water stands at the national maximum, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk lands in the top 6.6% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss is in the top 7.1% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 35244, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Birmingham, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 99%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.8 ± 2.1 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 74.9 years — 3.9 years above them.

    Ranked #401 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 28.7; chronic-disease standing 87.8 — 59 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,320 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 39.9 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 78.8 ± 2.1 years.

    Ranked #1,408 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.1%21.2–27.1
High blood pressure among adults35.7%31.8–39.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.8–8.3
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.3–10.7
Coronary heart disease among adults4.3%3.8–4.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.5%3.9–5.1
Depression among adults22.6%19.3–26.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.1%7.8–10.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.5%33.5–41.5
Obesity among adults31.2%25.5–37.1
Stroke among adults2.3%2.1–2.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.8%5.4–8.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.2%5.1–7.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.5%69.0–75.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.3%74.6–81.6
Cholesterol screening among adults88.1%86.2–89.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.5%61.9–71.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.9%67.5–74.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.5%71.9–84.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.3%15.3–21.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.2%8.6–12.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.1%15.0–21.4
Short sleep duration among adults34.9%29.8–40.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.9%12.0–16.0
Frequent mental distress among adults15.0%13.2–16.9
Frequent physical distress among adults10.3%9.0–11.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.0%10.4–13.6
Any disability among adults24.8%21.3–28.4
Hearing disability among adults5.5%4.8–6.2
Independent living disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.8
Mobility disability among adults9.7%8.3–11.1
Self-care disability among adults2.4%2.2–2.7
Vision disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.3%17.5–23.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.1–11.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.7–6.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.1–9.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.9–6.4
Loneliness among adults30.4%26.3–34.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.9–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–647.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)2.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)50.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)1.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle0.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription96.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate91.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population5.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households44.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+11.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age35.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$118,344$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$312,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$1,690$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.8 yr ± 1.0678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.06 years of 78.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured