Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

35125

in Pell City, AlabamaPopulation 11,279

44.34/ 100

Ranked #23,075 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranked #265 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #70 of 116 Birmingham, AL ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Pharmacy access

0.74 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.55 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

57.9%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

13.1 mi

in the top 14.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, ZIP 35125, one of several in Pell City, Alabama sits in the bottom 28% nationally (23,075th) and the top 43% of Alabama (265th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: pharmacy is in the top 2.1% nationally. Distance to an emergency room rests at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Outpatient sits in the top 6.4% nationally, and mental-health providers registers in the top 11.7% nationally. Subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 12.7% nationally, and modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 13.5% nationally. Working the other way, modeled air-toxics cancer risk lies in the top 4.5% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden settles in the top 6.4% nationally. Modeled pfas stands in the top 8.9% nationally, and loneliness is in the top 10.9% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. ZIP 35120, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Birmingham, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.9 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $59,891 predicts 78.1 years — 4.2 years below.

    Ranked #5,147 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 73.9 ± 1.2 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.8%28.5–35.4
High blood pressure among adults42.5%38.2–46.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%7.9–9.7
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.1–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%7.0–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%7.9–10.0
Depression among adults26.0%22.3–30.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.8%11.9–15.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.7%38.2–47.0
Obesity among adults40.5%33.0–48.0
Stroke among adults4.1%3.7–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.7%13.6–20.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.3%8.7–12.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.6%74.8–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.5%76.0–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults85.0%83.0–87.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.5%60.4–70.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.6%53.5–61.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.5%66.8–81.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%12.2–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.0%14.7–19.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.8%25.3–34.3
Short sleep duration among adults36.0%29.8–42.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.8%20.9–26.7
Frequent mental distress among adults18.5%16.4–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.4%13.6–17.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.7%15.7–19.7
Any disability among adults38.7%34.2–43.2
Hearing disability among adults9.3%8.2–10.4
Independent living disability among adults10.4%9.3–11.6
Mobility disability among adults17.5%15.3–19.6
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.2–5.1
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.3–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.4%21.9–29.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.3%15.8–20.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.3%11.3–15.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.1%11.3–14.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.3–10.6
Loneliness among adults37.4%32.3–42.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.6–10.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6418.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)18.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle4.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription90.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate69.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population2.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households55.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+17.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age36.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$59,891$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$183,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$925$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.9 yr ± 0.6078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.60 years of 73.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured