Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

35112

in Margaret, AlabamaPopulation 120

54.80/ 100

Ranked #9,699 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #61 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (top 9.9%)

Ranked #25 of 116 Birmingham, AL ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Crowded housing

21.8%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

60%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.8%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Margaret, Alabama (ZIP 35112) places in the top 30% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,699th) and the top 9.9% of Alabama (61st).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: housing-cost burden settles at the national minimum, and poverty sits at the national minimum. Homeownership lies at the national maximum, and home broadband subscription rests at the national maximum. Modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 5.1% nationally. Unemployment is at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle lands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. On the other side, crowded housing stands in the top 1.0% nationally, modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the top 4.5% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water settles at the national maximum.

Beside the areas that surround it, crowded housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 35173, about 1.0 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Birmingham, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.9%23.5–30.4
High blood pressure among adults34.6%30.3–39.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.8%7.0–8.7
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.8–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults4.8%4.1–5.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%4.6–7.0
Depression among adults26.3%22.4–30.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.5%8.0–11.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.8%35.1–44.4
Obesity among adults36.3%29.1–44.0
Stroke among adults2.6%2.2–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.7%10.2–15.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.8%5.0–9.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.1%70.3–77.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.7%74.8–82.2
Cholesterol screening among adults87.6%85.1–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.7%63.5–73.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.7%59.9–67.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.3%69.9–83.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.5%14.2–21.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.1%10.1–16.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.6%17.1–26.3
Short sleep duration among adults35.1%28.8–41.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.2%13.2–19.7
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%14.8–19.8
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%10.3–14.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.3%11.8–16.9
Any disability among adults29.2%24.5–34.4
Hearing disability among adults6.0%5.2–6.9
Independent living disability among adults7.2%5.9–8.5
Mobility disability among adults11.2%9.1–13.5
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.4–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.5%2.9–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.3%19.5–27.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%8.3–14.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.5%4.8–8.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.1–11.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.1–7.5
Loneliness among adults36.0%30.7–41.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.6–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6425.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)50.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)21.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+15.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age45.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$76,010$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.4 yr ± 0.8078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.80 years of 75.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured