Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

35211

in Birmingham, AlabamaPopulation 24,924

34.17/ 100

Ranked #29,675 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 7.5%)

Ranked #536 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 13.5%)

Ranked #106 of 116 Birmingham, AL ZIPs (bottom 8.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Diabetes

23.8%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.6%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.9%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.9%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

53.1%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

26%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

14.3%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

41.9%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

45.2%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40.1 per million

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 35211, one of several in Birmingham, Alabama comes out in the bottom 7.5% nationally (29,675th) and the bottom 13.5% of Alabama (536th).

continue reading

The data is direct about where this area carries real strain: modeled diabetes lies in the top 0.8% nationally, self-care disability sits in the top 1.9% nationally, and stroke settles in the top 1.4% nationally. Modeled vision disability registers in the top 3.3% nationally, high blood pressure stands in the top 1.4% nationally, and mobility disability lands in the top 2.4% nationally. Modeled independent living disability is in the top 3.6% nationally, and loneliness resides in the top 2.0% nationally. Modeled short sleep rests in the top 2.8% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk lies in the top 2.3% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 35022, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Birmingham, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 1%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 71.7 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $34,884 predicts 75.9 years — 4.2 years below.

    Ranked #5,183 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 71.7 ± 1.1 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 74.3 years — 2.6 years below them.

    Ranked #2,005 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.1 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 71.7 ± 1.1 years.

    Ranked #471 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.6%29.9–35.3
High blood pressure among adults53.1%50.0–56.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.7%5.2–6.3
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.1–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults9.0%8.2–10.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.2%9.0–11.3
Depression among adults21.0%18.4–23.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults23.8%21.5–26.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.9%37.6–44.2
Obesity among adults45.9%41.3–50.6
Stroke among adults6.9%6.4–7.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years27.3%23.2–31.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.3%10.7–14.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.8%79.8–83.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.8%81.4–86.1
Cholesterol screening among adults86.2%84.5–87.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.4%65.2–73.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults44.7%41.0–48.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years83.0%77.9–87.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.9%9.1–12.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.4%16.2–20.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults39.1%35.2–43.0
Short sleep duration among adults45.2%40.8–49.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults31.7%28.6–34.4
Frequent mental distress among adults18.7%16.7–20.7
Frequent physical distress among adults16.1%14.3–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.1%17.1–21.1
Any disability among adults44.5%40.7–48.1
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.6–8.2
Independent living disability among adults14.3%12.9–15.7
Mobility disability among adults26.0%23.6–28.3
Self-care disability among adults8.6%7.8–9.3
Vision disability among adults10.9%9.9–11.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.9%26.7–33.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults37.1%33.9–40.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults33.2%30.0–36.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.6%23.1–28.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults17.8%16.1–19.8
Loneliness among adults41.9%38.0–45.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults20.2%18.1–22.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate33.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6425.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)14.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)6.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle14.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription84.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)48.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate40.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population8.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households32.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+17.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age36.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$34,884$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$96,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$1,030$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth71.7 yr ± 0.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.55 years of 71.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured