Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

35176

in Vandiver, AlabamaPopulation 704

43.49/ 100

Ranked #23,914 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranked #287 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranked #71 of 116 Birmingham, AL ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

0.94%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

24.5%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

61.7%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

72.2%

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST14th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

44.6%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

96.7%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

46%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST55th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

3.4 mi

in the bottom 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

10.9 mi

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Vandiver, Alabama (ZIP 35176) lands in the bottom 25% nationally (23,914th) and the top 46% of Alabama (287th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 1.2% nationally, and fiber broadband settles in the top 8.5% nationally. On the other side, modeled air-toxics cancer risk is in the top 4.5% nationally, tooth loss sits in the top 7.9% nationally, and pfas lands in the top 7.3% nationally. Home broadband subscription lies in the bottom 7.5% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol stands in the top 5.3% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure rests in the top 9.8% nationally, and humid heat registers in the top 11.8% nationally. Households without a vehicle resides in the top 12.9% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. On the overall standing, ZIP 35094, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Birmingham, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.7%30.2–37.4
High blood pressure among adults46.0%41.8–50.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.3%9.2–11.4
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.8–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.6%7.4–9.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.7%7.9–11.8
Depression among adults24.5%21.0–28.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.5%12.4–16.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.6%40.4–48.9
Obesity among adults34.6%28.6–41.1
Stroke among adults4.3%3.7–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.5%20.4–29.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.5%7.2–12.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.4%75.4–81.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.2%75.7–82.6
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%83.4–88.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.9%62.1–71.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.0%48.0–56.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.0%65.1–80.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.4–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.4%12.8–20.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.0%22.8–33.5
Short sleep duration among adults37.4%32.0–43.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.3%19.3–27.7
Frequent mental distress among adults17.1%14.7–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.5%13.2–18.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.6%13.7–19.4
Any disability among adults37.3%31.9–42.7
Hearing disability among adults10.2%8.9–11.7
Independent living disability among adults10.2%8.4–12.1
Mobility disability among adults18.3%15.2–21.6
Self-care disability among adults4.6%3.8–5.5
Vision disability among adults5.8%4.9–6.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.7%18.2–25.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.8%12.2–20.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.2%8.3–14.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.3–12.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.6–9.8
Loneliness among adults31.6%27.1–36.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.1–9.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6423.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)18.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)6.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)0.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle10.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription72.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate68.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households83.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+16.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age44.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$49,348$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$94,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$964$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.5 yr ± 2.1278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.12 years of 75.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured