Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

35063

in Empire, AlabamaPopulation 3,606

36.30/ 100

Ranked #28,853 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.1%)

Ranked #506 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranked #103 of 116 Birmingham, AL ZIPs (bottom 11.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Independent-living disability

12.8%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20.3%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

38.5 per million

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

42%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.60%

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

70.8%

in the bottom 18% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US18th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

Empire, Alabama (ZIP 35063) ranks in the bottom 10.1% nationally (28,853rd) and the bottom 18% of Alabama (506th).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: modeled loud transportation noise sits at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled tree cover resides in the top 12.6% nationally. On the other side, modeled independent living disability stands in the top 7.5% nationally, cognitive disability sits in the top 8.2% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk resides in the top 7.7% nationally. Modeled short sleep stands in the top 9.2% nationally, fair or poor health sits in the top 10.6% nationally, and mobility disability resides in the top 10.7% nationally. Modeled humid heat stands in the top 12.2% nationally, and hearing disability sits in the top 12.7% nationally.

For context, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 35033, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Birmingham, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.2%32.3–38.3
High blood pressure among adults44.9%41.4–48.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.5–10.1
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.7–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.4–10.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.1%10.7–13.7
Depression among adults28.0%24.7–31.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.1%14.3–18.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.9%39.2–46.7
Obesity among adults37.2%31.4–43.4
Stroke among adults4.8%4.4–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.6%16.6–23.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.0%9.9–14.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.1%75.5–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.2%76.0–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults83.3%81.1–85.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.9%59.7–68.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.0%48.4–55.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.8%64.0–76.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.8%11.6–16.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.6%19.0–24.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.5%30.2–39.2
Short sleep duration among adults42.0%36.8–47.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.9%25.7–32.2
Frequent mental distress among adults19.9%17.9–22.0
Frequent physical distress among adults18.5%16.6–20.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.3%18.3–22.6
Any disability among adults44.2%39.9–48.5
Hearing disability among adults10.6%9.6–11.8
Independent living disability among adults12.8%11.5–14.3
Mobility disability among adults21.7%19.4–24.3
Self-care disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.7
Vision disability among adults7.4%6.6–8.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.8%21.6–28.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.1%19.1–25.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.0%14.4–20.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.9%12.0–16.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.5–12.4
Loneliness among adults36.2%31.9–40.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.4–11.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6424.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)27.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)7.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle3.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription81.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate84.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households49.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+14.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age39.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$61,138$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$110,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$956$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.3 yr ± 1.0778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.07 years of 72.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured