Skip to main content
ZipVitals

How Missouri's ZIP codes measure up on health

The ZipVitals Score across Missouri — built one ZIP code at a time, then rolled up to the state by resident population.

Data release 2026993 of 1,018 ZIP codes scored · 6.2M residents represented

Score snapshot

48.27Statewide ZipVitals Scorepopulation-weighted average of its ZIP codes
43.75Median scoremiddle of 993 scored ZIPs
69.05Highest score63005 · Chesterfield
19.04Lowest score63851 · Hayti
50.01Spreadpoints between highest & lowest ZIP

People & national context

#43State rankof 51 states and equivalents with a computed score
70%Residents in below-average ZIPs4.3M of 6.2M, in ZIPs scoring under the national average (53.48)
0.91MResidents in the top 50 ZIPs15% of the state
0.25MResidents in the bottom 50 ZIPs4% of the state
0ZIPs in the national top 100

Missouri's ZIP codes, ranked

Highest-scoring

Top 50 of 993
  1. 163005in Chesterfield · 19,779 residents69.05
  2. 263131in Town and Country · 17,935 residents68.94
  3. 364113in Kansas City · 12,386 residents67.96
  4. 463017in Chesterfield · 43,243 residents67.44
  5. 563038in Glencoe · 7,107 residents67.22
  6. 663124in Ladue · 10,839 residents66.62
  7. 763040in Grover · 8,526 residents66.34
  8. 863011in Ballwin · 35,920 residents65.71
  9. 963105in Clayton · 18,875 residents65.40
  10. 1063141in Creve Coeur · 20,932 residents64.55
  11. 1163122in Kirkwood · 41,634 residents64.43
  12. 1263144in Brentwood · 9,505 residents64.19
  13. 1363021in Ballwin · 55,666 residents63.84
  14. 1463117in Richmond Heights · 9,261 residents63.81
  15. 1563119in Webster Groves · 34,181 residents63.10
  16. 1664167in Kansas City · 243 residents62.83
  17. 1764157in Kansas City · 23,030 residents62.71
  18. 1863127in Sunset Hills · 5,268 residents62.64
  19. 1963110in St. Louis · 17,645 residents62.50
  20. 2064153in Kansas City · 6,653 residents61.69
  21. 2163126in Crestwood · 15,452 residents61.66
  22. 2264156in Kansas City · 7,946 residents61.21
  23. 2365809in Springfield · 11,384 residents61.05
  24. 2465039in Hartsburg · 3,076 residents60.94
  25. 2563146in Maryland Heights · 30,678 residents60.82
  26. 2664112in Kansas City · 8,260 residents60.80
  27. 2763367in Lake St. Louis · 29,725 residents60.68
  28. 2863368in O'Fallon · 46,966 residents60.67
  29. 2965010in Ashland · 7,205 residents60.49
  30. 3065203in Columbia · 61,539 residents60.41
  31. 3164082in Lee's Summit · 20,068 residents60.37
  32. 3264154in Kansas City · 13,851 residents60.22
  33. 3363132in Olivette · 14,283 residents60.10
  34. 3463304in Weldon Spring · 43,195 residents59.93
  35. 3565810in Springfield · 22,137 residents59.37
  36. 3664105in Kansas City · 6,312 residents59.37
  37. 3764165in Kansas City · 212 residents59.28
  38. 3863341in Defiance · 3,515 residents59.21
  39. 3963332in Augusta · 1,651 residents59.09
  40. 4064166in Kansas City · 270 residents59.03
  41. 4163025in Eureka · 19,508 residents58.89
  42. 4263073in Saint Albans · 803 residents58.71
  43. 4364034in Greenwood · 8,998 residents58.58
  44. 4464114in Kansas City · 24,229 residents58.51
  45. 4564086in Lee's Summit · 23,599 residents58.44
  46. 4664064in Lee's Summit · 20,050 residents58.42
  47. 4764155in Kansas City · 28,824 residents58.35
  48. 4863139in St. Louis · 21,631 residents58.24
  49. 4963143in Maplewood · 8,975 residents58.11
  50. 5064158in Kansas City · 7,317 residents58.09
Open the full Missouri ranking →One page, all 993 scored ZIPs — sortable by score, residents, or place

What the distribution shows

Across Missouri’s 1,018 ZIP codes, the ZipVitals Score spans a wide range. 993 of them carry enough measured coverage across all nine health domains to enter the population-weighted composite above; the rest are held out rather than filled from a coarser geography.

Assembled from the same ZIP-level data as every per-ZIP page. Read the full method →

Where Missouri stands, domain by domain

The ZipVitals Score above combines nine domains of health into one number. This is where Missouri's ZIP codes sit against ZIP codes across the country on each of them, weighted by how many residents live in each one — strongest at the top.

Strongest domain

Healthcare Access · 74th

Weighted by residents, this state’s ZIP codes sit around the 74th percentile of US ZIP codes here — its highest of the nine scoring domains.

Weakest domain

Environmental Hazard · 33rd

Weighted by residents, this state’s ZIP codes sit around the 33rd percentile of US ZIP codes here — its lowest of the nine scoring domains.

Healthcare Access74
Social Need / SDOH58
Chronic Disease Burden53
Preventive Care44
Disability43
Risk Behavior36
Mental Health35
Climate / Disaster Risk35
Environmental Hazard33

Read each bar as a national percentile from 0 to 100. The dark line marks the national median: a bar past it means Missouri's ZIP codes typically place above most ZIP codes in the country on that domain. A domain Missouri cannot place honestly is shown greyed as "Not enough data" rather than given a number.

Each figure is the population-weighted average of this state's ZIP codes' standing on that domain, compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes. A ZIP code counts toward a domain only if it carries enough measured data on it and enough of Missouri's residents live in the ZIP codes that do; the rest are held out rather than filled in from a coarser geography. Read the full method →

Why this matters

The ZipVitals Score combines nine domains of health — from chronic disease and preventive care to environmental hazard, social need, and healthcare access — into one 0–100 index for each ZIP code, computed the same way everywhere from public federal and academic data. The Missouri figures on this page are population-weighted rollups of those per-ZIP scores, so they describe Missouri's residents rather than a coarser geography relabeled as the state.

A high score describes favorable documented conditions; it is not a claim about individual residents, and it does not capture everything that shapes a community's health. Where a ZIP code scores low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.