Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

63870

in Parma, MissouriPopulation 1,066

30.47/ 100

Ranked #30,666 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 4.4%)

Ranked #944 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 5.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mobility disability

26.2%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

14.6%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

22.6%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.5%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.1%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

32.7%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

19.2%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

26%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.4%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

45.4%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Parma, Missouri (ZIP 63870) sits in the bottom 4.4% nationally (30,666th) and the bottom 5.0% of Missouri (944th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

What the numbers press hardest on defines much of the story here: modeled mobility disability settles in the top 2.2% nationally, independent living disability stands in the top 3.2% nationally, and cognitive disability is in the top 3.0% nationally. Modeled self-care disability rests in the top 4.1% nationally, stroke sits in the top 3.6% nationally, and fair or poor health registers in the top 4.6% nationally. Modeled diabetes lands in the top 5.2% nationally, and tooth loss resides in the top 6.2% nationally. Modeled vision disability lies in the top 6.3% nationally, and obesity settles in the top 3.8% nationally.

ZIP 63801, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall. Modeled self-care disability settles in the top 4.1% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 12%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.0%33.8–40.4
High blood pressure among adults47.5%43.8–51.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%8.0–9.5
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.5–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults10.5%9.4–11.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.4%11.9–15.0
Depression among adults24.7%21.6–28.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.2%17.1–21.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.7%37.8–45.7
Obesity among adults45.4%38.9–52.1
Stroke among adults6.1%5.6–6.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years26.0%22.2–30.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.3%11.3–15.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.5%79.2–83.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.4%76.4–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults83.3%81.3–85.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.0%60.2–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.9%46.3–53.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.2%61.9–76.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.3%10.3–14.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.5%20.5–26.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults43.3%38.4–48.4
Short sleep duration among adults42.3%36.5–48.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults32.7%29.1–36.4
Frequent mental distress among adults19.6%17.6–21.8
Frequent physical distress among adults20.0%17.9–22.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.6%20.3–25.0
Any disability among adults48.4%43.9–52.9
Hearing disability among adults11.2%10.1–12.4
Independent living disability among adults14.6%13.0–16.3
Mobility disability among adults26.2%23.5–29.2
Self-care disability among adults7.5%6.7–8.3
Vision disability among adults9.4%8.4–10.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.5%20.3–27.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.0%22.8–29.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults24.0%21.1–27.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.2%16.8–21.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.7%12.1–15.4
Loneliness among adults33.7%29.2–38.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults15.0%13.3–17.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate30.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6422.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)14.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)0.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle9.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription95.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)12.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate59.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households39.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+13.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age34.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$57,639$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$62,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$545$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.8 yr ± 1.0478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.04 years of 75.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured