Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

64034

in Greenwood, MissouriPopulation 8,998

58.58/ 100

Ranked #5,916 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #43 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 4.4%)

Ranked #42 of 200 Kansas City, MO-KS ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Home broadband subscription

98.7%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.9%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

2.3%

in the bottom 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.1%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.7%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

8.5%

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.5%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$120,041

in the top 9.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

2.5%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Greenwood, Missouri (ZIP 64034) lands in the top 18% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,916th) and the top 4.4% of Missouri (43rd).

continue reading

A number of signals point in a favorable direction for this area: home broadband subscription resides in the top 6.2% nationally, and poverty lands in the bottom 7.7% nationally. Modeled food insecurity registers in the bottom 7.8% nationally, and coronary heart disease sits in the bottom 7.0% nationally. Modeled diabetes rests in the bottom 6.1% nationally, modeled stroke is in the bottom 6.7% nationally, and homeownership stands in the top 10.3% nationally. Household income settles in the top 9.7% nationally. Working the other way, modeled binge drinking lies in the top 6.6% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden resides in the top 9.8% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 64082, just across the boundary. On a broader view, the area also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kansas City, MO-KS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.5 ± 2.0 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.8 years — 2.7 years above them.

    Ranked #995 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.5%22.5–26.6
High blood pressure among adults29.8%27.3–32.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.6–8.8
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.9–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults4.7%4.3–5.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.7–6.0
Depression among adults25.8%23.2–28.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.5%7.5–9.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.2%34.5–39.9
Obesity among adults32.9%29.2–36.4
Stroke among adults2.5%2.3–2.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.3%6.2–8.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.1%5.0–7.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.6%70.9–76.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.6%74.1–79.0
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.2–88.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.6%60.3–66.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.8%69.4–74.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.3%71.3–80.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.9%17.5–22.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.3%10.4–14.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.9%19.2–24.8
Short sleep duration among adults31.7%28.6–34.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.3%12.7–16.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.1%15.2–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults11.3%10.1–12.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.0%12.3–15.8
Any disability among adults28.2%25.3–31.2
Hearing disability among adults6.1%5.5–6.7
Independent living disability among adults6.5%5.7–7.3
Mobility disability among adults10.8%9.6–12.1
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.2–2.8
Vision disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.3%17.1–21.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.8–9.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.1–6.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.7–10.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.9–6.4
Loneliness among adults30.0%27.1–33.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.3–7.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–642.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)2.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)42.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)1.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle0.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription98.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate93.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households55.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+16.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age43.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$120,041$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$350,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$1,859$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.5 yr ± 1.0178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.01 years of 80.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured