Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

63866

in Marston, MissouriPopulation 409

28.22/ 100

Ranked #31,073 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 3.1%)

Ranked #968 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 2.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Independent-living disability

14.9%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

23.2%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

26.2%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

28.3%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.4%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

32.9%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.1%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

19%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.3%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

The read

Marston, Missouri (ZIP 63866), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 3.1% nationally (31,073rd) and the bottom 2.6% of Missouri (968th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Where this area is stretched, the data is unambiguous: modeled independent living disability stands in the top 2.7% nationally, cognitive disability is in the top 2.2% nationally, and mobility disability rests in the top 2.2% nationally. Modeled tooth loss sits in the top 4.2% nationally, self-care disability registers in the top 4.4% nationally, and fair or poor health lands in the top 4.4% nationally. Modeled stroke resides in the top 3.6% nationally, and diabetes lies in the top 5.6% nationally. Modeled tree cover settles at the national minimum, and vision disability stands in the top 6.6% nationally.

A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 63862, just across the boundary. Modeled tooth loss stands in the top 4.2% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 20%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 1%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 12%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.1%33.5–41.0
High blood pressure among adults47.6%43.5–51.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%7.8–9.7
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.6–13.6
Coronary heart disease among adults10.6%9.4–11.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.9%12.1–15.9
Depression among adults25.6%22.1–29.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.0%16.6–21.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.8%37.5–46.2
Obesity among adults45.8%38.4–53.1
Stroke among adults6.1%5.4–6.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years28.3%24.1–32.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.8%10.2–16.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.2%78.7–83.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%75.9–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults82.6%80.1–85.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.6%58.5–68.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.9%47.1–54.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.1%61.9–77.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.2%10.0–14.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults24.5%21.0–28.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults43.6%38.0–49.4
Short sleep duration among adults42.0%35.6–48.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults32.9%28.6–37.4
Frequent mental distress among adults20.2%18.1–22.7
Frequent physical distress among adults20.2%17.7–22.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults23.2%20.3–26.1
Any disability among adults48.8%43.6–54.1
Hearing disability among adults11.3%10.0–12.6
Independent living disability among adults14.9%13.0–16.9
Mobility disability among adults26.2%22.8–29.6
Self-care disability among adults7.4%6.4–8.5
Vision disability among adults9.3%8.2–10.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.7%20.1–27.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.3%22.2–30.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults24.8%21.0–28.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.1%16.4–22.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.9%12.0–16.0
Loneliness among adults34.0%29.0–39.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults15.2%13.2–17.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate34.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6420.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)35.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)2.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle16.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription89.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate39.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households48.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+9.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age39.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$33,750$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$64,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$673$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.5 yr ± 0.8678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.86 years of 72.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured