Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

63126

in Crestwood, MissouriPopulation 15,452

61.66/ 100

Ranked #3,720 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 11.7%)

Ranked #21 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 2.2%)

Ranked #18 of 234 St. Louis, MO-IL ZIPs (top 7.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.3%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.5%

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.2%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

28.1%

in the bottom 11.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

1.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

100 intersections/sq mi

in the top 10.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.8%

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Crestwood, Missouri (ZIP 63126) stands in the top 11.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,720th) and the top 2.2% of Missouri (21st).

continue reading

The bright spots in the data define much of the story here: lead in tap water lies at the national minimum, and modeled food insecurity is in the bottom 4.7% nationally. Modeled short sleep registers in the bottom 7.5% nationally, and transportation lies in the bottom 9.9% nationally. Modeled obesity is in the bottom 11.7% nationally, physicians registers in the top 10.0% nationally, and walkability lies in the top 10.1% nationally. Civic is in the top 10.7% nationally. On the other side, modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the top 4.5% nationally, and expected annual loss lies in the top 9.4% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. ZIP 63119, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the St. Louis, MO-IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 97%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.1 ± 1.3 years. The 44 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.5 years — 2.7 years above them.

    Ranked #1,047 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 80.1 ± 1.3 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.4%26.0–31.0
High blood pressure among adults33.9%31.1–36.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.2–11.0
Current asthma among adults10.1%9.0–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%5.2–6.8
Depression among adults23.8%21.2–26.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.5%8.3–10.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.4%34.4–40.5
Obesity among adults28.1%24.8–31.8
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.3%7.4–11.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.4%4.6–6.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.1%76.5–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.1%76.4–81.6
Cholesterol screening among adults88.2%86.7–89.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.4%67.2–75.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.5%67.4–73.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.1%71.6–83.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.7%15.4–20.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.5%9.9–13.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.3%18.8–24.1
Short sleep duration among adults29.5%25.8–33.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.6%12.9–16.4
Frequent mental distress among adults14.8%13.3–16.4
Frequent physical distress among adults11.8%10.5–13.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.9%11.6–14.4
Any disability among adults29.9%27.2–32.9
Hearing disability among adults7.5%6.7–8.3
Independent living disability among adults6.7%6.0–7.5
Mobility disability among adults12.0%10.6–13.6
Self-care disability among adults2.7%2.4–3.0
Vision disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.1%14.8–19.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.1–8.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.2–6.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.4–8.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.5–5.9
Loneliness among adults30.2%27.0–33.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.7–6.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–643.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)3.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)54.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)2.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle3.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription94.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate86.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population3.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households50.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+20.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age41.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$98,852$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$306,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$1,121$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.1 yr ± 0.6678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.66 years of 80.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured