Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

65729

in Pontiac, MissouriPopulation 126

28.59/ 100

Ranked #31,019 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 3.3%)

Ranked #964 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 3.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Hearing disability

17.6%

in the top 0.08% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

16.2%

in the top 0.09% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

8.0%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

32.9%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

23.3%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.8%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

55.7%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

15.7%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

36.1%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

49.5%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

Pontiac, Missouri (ZIP 65729), overall, ranks in the bottom 3.3% nationally (31,019th) and the bottom 3.0% of Missouri (964th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Reading across the data, the real pressures come first: modeled hearing disability rests in the top 0.08% nationally, coronary heart disease registers in the top 0.09% nationally, and stroke resides in the top 0.4% nationally. Modeled mobility disability settles in the top 0.2% nationally, diabetes is in the top 1.0% nationally, and self-care disability sits in the top 1.6% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure lands in the top 0.7% nationally, and independent living disability lies in the top 1.9% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health stands in the top 2.0% nationally, and high cholesterol rests in the top 0.4% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. ZIP 65655, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.4%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.06%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Disability

in the bottom 0.08%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults47.3%43.7–50.6
High blood pressure among adults55.7%51.7–59.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults14.4%13.1–15.5
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.2–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults16.2%14.6–17.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults19.7%17.2–22.4
Depression among adults25.2%22.1–28.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults23.3%20.8–25.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened49.5%45.5–53.4
Obesity among adults43.3%36.2–50.3
Stroke among adults8.0%7.2–9.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years28.2%24.7–31.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.0%9.4–14.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure86.8%84.9–88.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.9%81.3–86.2
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.1–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.5%60.9–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults46.4%43.2–49.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.0%63.9–77.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults9.9%8.2–11.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.8%20.3–27.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults44.3%38.7–49.7
Short sleep duration among adults37.1%31.5–43.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults36.1%31.8–40.7
Frequent mental distress among adults17.7%15.9–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults23.6%21.0–26.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.5%18.9–24.2
Any disability among adults53.9%49.1–58.6
Hearing disability among adults17.6%16.0–19.3
Independent living disability among adults15.7%13.8–17.7
Mobility disability among adults32.9%29.2–36.8
Self-care disability among adults8.8%7.7–10.1
Vision disability among adults10.6%9.3–12.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.1%17.3–23.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.4%17.6–25.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults21.0%17.3–24.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.2%11.1–15.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.6–12.9
Loneliness among adults28.9%25.0–33.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.5–12.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households91.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+81.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age69.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$61,818$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.9 yr ± 1.1078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.10 years of 74.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured