Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

65676

in Isabella, MissouriPopulation 461

24.99/ 100

Ranked #31,474 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.9%)

Ranked #985 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 0.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Hearing disability

18.2%

in the top 0.07% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

16.5%

in the top 0.08% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

35.5%

in the top 0.07% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

8.6%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

38.4%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

9.7%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

17.3%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

24.2%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

37.9%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

56.6%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Isabella, Missouri (ZIP 65676) lands in the bottom 1.9% nationally (31,474th) and the bottom 0.9% of Missouri (985th).

continue reading

The measures that press hardest set the tone here: modeled hearing disability registers in the top 0.07% nationally, and coronary heart disease sits in the top 0.08% nationally. Modeled mobility disability rests in the top 0.07% nationally, and stroke is in the top 0.2% nationally. Modeled tooth loss stands in the top 0.6% nationally, self-care disability settles in the top 0.9% nationally, and independent living disability lies in the top 0.9% nationally. Modeled diabetes resides in the top 0.7% nationally, fair or poor health lands in the top 1.2% nationally, and high blood pressure registers in the top 0.5% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 65655, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.05%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults48.8%44.2–53.2
High blood pressure among adults56.6%51.5–61.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults14.3%12.7–15.9
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.2–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults16.5%14.4–18.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults21.3%17.6–25.4
Depression among adults25.3%21.4–29.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults24.2%20.8–27.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened49.4%44.2–54.4
Obesity among adults44.3%35.5–53.2
Stroke among adults8.6%7.3–9.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years38.4%32.9–43.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.1%8.1–14.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure87.1%84.6–89.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.1%81.0–86.8
Cholesterol screening among adults86.8%84.7–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.2%50.8–63.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.5%44.7–52.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.7%57.3–75.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults9.8%7.9–12.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults25.3%20.7–30.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults46.5%39.5–54.0
Short sleep duration among adults36.6%29.7–44.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults37.9%32.2–44.3
Frequent mental distress among adults17.8%15.5–20.4
Frequent physical distress among adults24.7%21.3–28.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.3%18.9–26.4
Any disability among adults55.5%49.4–62.0
Hearing disability among adults18.2%15.9–20.6
Independent living disability among adults17.3%14.5–20.5
Mobility disability among adults35.5%30.4–40.9
Self-care disability among adults9.7%7.9–11.7
Vision disability among adults11.6%9.6–13.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.9%15.7–22.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.3%17.4–27.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.0%17.9–28.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.3%10.7–16.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.7%9.7–14.0
Loneliness among adults28.5%23.7–33.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.6–13.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6418.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)8.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle9.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription91.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate77.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population1.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households42.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+31.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age57.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$45,170$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$150,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.0 yr ± 1.3278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.32 years of 76.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured