Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

63017

in Chesterfield, MissouriPopulation 43,243

67.44/ 100

Ranked #1,151 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 3.6%)

Ranked #4 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 0.5%)

Ranked #3 of 234 St. Louis, MO-IL ZIPs (top 1.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Food insecurity

5.4%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

5.4%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.0%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

27.2%

in the bottom 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

24.5%

in the bottom 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

3.9%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74.6%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 63017, one of several in Chesterfield, Missouri, on the composite measure, lands in the top 3.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,151st) and the top 0.5% of Missouri (4th).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: modeled food insecurity resides in the bottom 0.7% nationally, housing insecurity lies in the bottom 1.2% nationally, and transportation settles in the bottom 1.6% nationally. Modeled short sleep stands in the bottom 1.8% nationally, obesity is in the bottom 4.8% nationally, and utility shutoff rests in the bottom 3.3% nationally. Lead in tap water sits at the national minimum. Distance to an emergency room registers at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Working the other way, modeled air-toxics cancer risk lands in the top 4.5% nationally, and expected annual loss resides in the top 5.0% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 63005, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the St. Louis, MO-IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.7%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.3%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.2%

8%

Disability

healthier than 98%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 99%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.00%

8%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.2 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $127,095 predicts 81.0 years — 1.2 years above.

    Ranked #1,393 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.2 ± 1.0 years. The 45 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.4 years — 2.8 years above them.

    Ranked #939 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 82.2 ± 1.0 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.6%27.2–32.1
High blood pressure among adults35.8%33.1–38.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.6%10.6–12.6
Current asthma among adults9.1%8.1–10.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.7–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.1%4.6–5.8
Depression among adults20.1%17.8–22.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.1%9.0–11.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.9%36.8–43.1
Obesity among adults24.5%21.5–27.8
Stroke among adults3.0%2.8–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.8%4.6–7.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.3%3.7–5.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.6%80.2–84.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.8%79.5–84.0
Cholesterol screening among adults90.7%89.5–91.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.6%70.7–78.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults74.2%71.3–76.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.0%73.9–85.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%13.0–17.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.0%7.0–9.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.9%17.7–22.5
Short sleep duration among adults27.2%23.6–30.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.0%11.5–14.6
Frequent mental distress among adults11.8%10.6–13.1
Frequent physical distress among adults10.6%9.5–11.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.2%9.2–11.4
Any disability among adults28.4%25.8–31.2
Hearing disability among adults8.1%7.3–9.0
Independent living disability among adults5.6%5.1–6.3
Mobility disability among adults11.7%10.4–13.2
Self-care disability among adults2.3%2.1–2.6
Vision disability among adults3.1%2.9–3.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults16.1%14.1–18.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.6–6.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults3.3%2.7–3.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.7–6.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.0%3.5–4.5
Loneliness among adults28.6%25.6–31.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–643.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)2.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)69.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)3.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle4.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription95.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate75.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population15.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households56.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+28.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age47.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$127,095$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$466,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$1,709$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.2 yr ± 0.5278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.52 years of 82.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured