Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

63106

in St. Louis, MissouriPopulation 6,751

27.32/ 100

Ranked #31,198 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 2.8%)

Ranked #976 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 1.8%)

Ranked #225 of 234 St. Louis, MO-IL ZIPs (bottom 3.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

10.4%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

18.6%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

32.9%

in the top 0.03% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

37.6%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

13.2%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

26%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

37.2%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

37.6%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.9%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

1,601 units

in the top 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, ZIP 63106, one of several in St. Louis, Missouri lands in the bottom 2.8% nationally (31,198th) and the bottom 1.8% of Missouri (976th).

continue reading

Where this area bears down hardest, the measures speak first: modeled self-care disability registers in the top 0.5% nationally, and independent living disability sits in the top 0.4% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff rests in the top 0.03% nationally, and tooth loss is in the top 0.7% nationally. Modeled vision disability stands in the top 1.2% nationally, cognitive disability settles in the top 0.7% nationally, and housing insecurity lies in the top 0.2% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health resides in the top 1.3% nationally, and stroke lands in the top 1.4% nationally. On the encouraging side, subsidized affordable housing registers in the top 0.5% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, subsidized affordable housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 63101, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the St. Louis, MO-IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 1.0%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 1%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 1.0%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.9%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.7%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.0 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $20,679 predicts 73.9 years — 1.9 years below.

    Ranked #2,409 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.0 ± 1.5 years. The 45 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 74.8 years — 2.8 years below them.

    Ranked #2,194 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 72.0 ± 1.5 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.0%28.3–33.6
High blood pressure among adults50.0%46.8–53.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.8%4.3–5.2
Current asthma among adults14.9%13.2–16.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.5–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.2%10.8–13.6
Depression among adults23.6%20.8–26.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults22.1%19.9–24.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.7%31.7–37.9
Obesity among adults49.8%45.2–54.4
Stroke among adults6.9%6.3–7.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years37.6%33.2–41.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.8%11.7–16.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.5%75.2–79.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.9%81.5–86.0
Cholesterol screening among adults82.0%79.8–84.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.9%55.7–64.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults38.8%35.7–41.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.9%72.0–82.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.7%9.9–13.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults26.0%23.0–29.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults41.9%37.7–46.3
Short sleep duration among adults47.7%43.5–51.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults37.6%34.1–41.1
Frequent mental distress among adults23.0%20.6–25.4
Frequent physical distress among adults19.3%17.3–21.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults26.0%23.4–28.7
Any disability among adults48.6%44.8–52.6
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.7
Independent living disability among adults18.6%16.7–20.6
Mobility disability among adults27.6%25.0–30.3
Self-care disability among adults10.4%9.4–11.4
Vision disability among adults13.2%11.9–14.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults32.3%28.8–36.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults45.2%40.8–49.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults47.7%43.4–52.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults37.2%33.5–40.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults25.1%22.6–27.8
Loneliness among adults41.0%37.1–45.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults32.9%29.8–36.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate47.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6421.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)18.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)8.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle45.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription74.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)46.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate11.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population3.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households15.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+19.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age32.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$20,679$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$214,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$773$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.0 yr ± 0.7678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.76 years of 72.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured