Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

Archived release. This page is frozen at the data release below and will not change. Current data is at the latest ranking.

Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX metro ZIP codes, ranked by the ZipVitals Score

Every Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX metro ZIP code (ZCTA) with a ZipVitals Score, ranked within the metro — descriptive of documented conditions, never a verdict on the people who live there.

Data release 202689 ZIP codes in this ranking

Download the data (CSV)How the ZipVitals Score works
89 of 89 shown
#ZIP code · locatorScore
  1. 34978746in Austin · 28,256 residents71.44
  2. 49478739in Austin · 20,659 residents70.54
  3. 56478733in Austin · 9,029 residents70.15
  4. 70378738in Bee Cave · 31,019 residents69.35
  5. 74078703in Austin · 23,483 residents69.14
  6. 83578731in Austin · 27,507 residents68.68
  7. 85078759in Austin · 43,182 residents68.63
  8. 99678717in Austin · 37,262 residents68.09
  9. 1,08278730in Austin · 9,142 residents67.71
  10. 1,20978750in Austin · 29,277 residents67.26
  11. 1,30078732in Austin · 21,087 residents66.93
  12. 1,39878701in Austin · 11,824 residents66.59
  13. 1,44178749in Austin · 34,562 residents66.48
  14. 1,44878735in Austin · 20,996 residents66.46
  15. 1,60678727in Austin · 29,958 residents66.02
  16. 1,70978726in Austin · 14,506 residents65.77
  17. 1,82978737in Austin · 27,023 residents65.45
  18. 2,24078619in Driftwood · 6,693 residents64.42
  19. 2,24778704in Austin · 50,688 residents64.41
  20. 2,33778729in Austin · 30,460 residents64.22
  21. 2,42678757in Austin · 23,856 residents64.04
  22. 2,43478681in Round Rock · 56,691 residents64.02
  23. 2,43578756in Austin · 9,197 residents64.02
  24. 2,45578613in Cedar Park · 89,956 residents63.99
  25. 2,52878751in Austin · 16,961 residents63.87
  26. 2,63878734in Lakeway · 22,145 residents63.65
  27. 2,76078620in Dripping Springs · 22,860 residents63.40
  28. 2,78078633in Georgetown · 29,309 residents63.37
  29. 2,99578736in Austin · 9,651 residents62.95
  30. 3,03878652in Manchaca · 5,287 residents62.89
  31. 3,06078722in Austin · 6,767 residents62.84
  32. 3,14378748in Austin · 55,631 residents62.68
  33. 3,32678628in Georgetown · 50,822 residents62.32
  34. 3,58278665in Round Rock · 66,171 residents61.89
  35. 3,65278641in Leander · 99,865 residents61.78
  36. 3,92978669in Briarcliff · 12,592 residents61.32
  37. 4,10778702in Austin · 25,985 residents61.02
  38. 4,21678745in Austin · 61,219 residents60.87
  39. 4,67178723in Austin · 38,129 residents60.25
  40. 4,82278660in Pflugerville · 124,834 residents60.06
  41. 4,84878728in Austin · 26,777 residents60.03
  42. 4,98078642in Liberty Hill · 26,434 residents59.84
  43. 5,13678634in Hutto · 46,413 residents59.61
  44. 5,29778754in Austin · 32,690 residents59.38
  45. 5,33278645in Lago Vista · 15,256 residents59.34
  46. 5,70878747in Austin · 22,180 residents58.85
  47. 5,88378721in Austin · 10,997 residents58.62
  48. 6,52578610in Buda · 48,319 residents57.85
  49. 6,81478653in Manor · 41,291 residents57.49
  50. 7,39578626in Georgetown · 48,072 residents56.88
  51. 8,50478725in Austin · 10,746 residents55.81
  52. 8,51378663in Round Mountain · 503 residents55.80
  53. 8,73478664in Round Rock · 62,060 residents55.61
  54. 9,49078676in Wimberley · 15,822 residents54.97
  55. 10,64178615in Coupland · 1,637 residents54.05
  56. 10,94176578in Thrall · 1,762 residents53.82
  57. 11,60878753in Austin · 56,920 residents53.32
  58. 11,82978758in Austin · 49,617 residents53.17
  59. 11,94478640in Kyle · 77,531 residents53.10
  60. 12,36378744in Austin · 50,986 residents52.81
  61. 12,82376527in Florence · 4,918 residents52.46
  62. 12,93778741in Austin · 45,951 residents52.38
  63. 14,96176537in Jarrell · 16,272 residents50.92
  64. 15,41178602in Bastrop · 38,190 residents50.61
  65. 15,42578659in Paige · 2,660 residents50.60
  66. 15,64978724in Austin · 31,103 residents50.43
  67. 15,68578752in Austin · 23,317 residents50.41
  68. 17,39176574in Taylor · 20,242 residents49.20
  69. 17,44278705in Austin · 33,238 residents49.16
  70. 18,07578666in San Marcos · 88,583 residents48.71
  71. 18,61478621in Elgin · 30,411 residents48.25
  72. 18,71176511in Bartlett · 2,702 residents48.19
  73. 19,15976530in Granger · 2,598 residents47.82
  74. 19,17678719in Austin · 1,796 residents47.81
  75. 19,72378953in Rosanky · 1,089 residents47.36
  76. 19,77078957in Smithville · 10,543 residents47.32
  77. 19,97478622in Fentress · 331 residents47.16
  78. 20,71778644in Lockhart · 22,348 residents46.54
  79. 20,96178612in Cedar Creek · 19,799 residents46.33
  80. 20,99278661in Prairie Lea · 835 residents46.30
  81. 22,37578662in Red Rock · 3,015 residents45.02
  82. 22,47878650in Mc Dade · 2,409 residents44.94
  83. 24,06078656in Maxwell · 2,847 residents43.35
  84. 24,16478616in Mustang Ridge · 10,683 residents43.25
  85. 24,30878617in Del Valle · 30,756 residents43.08
  86. 24,45078648in Luling · 7,863 residents42.92
  87. 25,70378712in Austin · 201 residents41.45
  88. 28,95578655in Martindale · 3,730 residents36.09
  89. 30,03778742in Austin · 847 residents33.04

Don’t see a ZIP code you expected? Not every ZIP carries a Score — 1 of this metro's 90 don’t have enough measured data across the nine health domains, and PO-box-only ZIPs aren’t mapped areas. Any ZIP’s own page explains its standing. Look up any ZIP code →

How this ranking works

Ranks are each ZIP code’s position in the full national ZipVitals Score ranking, so the numbers jump — this metro holds 89 of the tens of thousands of scored US ZIP codes — and they never change with the sort direction; the rank a ZIP carries here is the rank it carries everywhere on this site. A ZIP whose data is too thin to score is held out entirely rather than filled from county or metro figures.

Cite this ranking

The permalink /metro/austin-round-rock-san-marcos-tx/ranking/2026-c0e0b3b0 resolves to this exact release and never changes; an always-latest version lives at /metro/austin-round-rock-san-marcos-tx/ranking. Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.

A high score describes favorable documented conditions — never a claim about residents. Where ZIP codes score low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.