Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

78644

in Lockhart, TexasPopulation 22,348

46.54/ 100

Ranked #20,717 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #808 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #78 of 89 Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX ZIPs (bottom 12.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

23.3%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

92 days/year

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

145.9 days/year

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST65th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57.3%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST26th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US90th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Lockhart, Texas (ZIP 78644) ranks in the bottom 35% nationally (20,717th) and the top 43% of Texas (808th).

continue reading

The burdens that read clearest in the data come first: modeled uninsured lands in the top 2.9% nationally, and extreme heat registers in the top 2.4% nationally. Modeled humid heat sits in the top 5.8% nationally, and colon screening rests in the bottom 7.9% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss is in the top 9.7% nationally. Better still, modeled radon stands in the bottom 2.2% nationally. Distance to a community health center settles at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Grocery lies in the top 12.4% nationally. Distance to a nursing home resides at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 14.8% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 78610, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.6%21.5–27.8
High blood pressure among adults35.2%31.0–39.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.6%6.0–7.3
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.7–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.7–7.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%6.0–7.5
Depression among adults22.2%18.8–26.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.4%12.5–16.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.9%32.5–41.4
Obesity among adults42.0%33.6–50.9
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.3%11.8–17.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years23.3%20.6–26.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.2%73.2–79.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.2%70.1–77.9
Cholesterol screening among adults84.8%83.0–86.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.3%52.2–62.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.7%48.0–55.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.0%61.5–77.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.1%13.2–19.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.2%12.3–16.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.4%27.5–37.5
Short sleep duration among adults36.9%30.3–43.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.4%22.5–28.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.6%15.7–19.8
Frequent physical distress among adults15.1%13.4–17.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.6%14.8–18.5
Any disability among adults34.4%30.0–39.0
Hearing disability among adults7.3%6.5–8.2
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.4–10.4
Mobility disability among adults16.6%14.6–18.8
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.3–5.1
Vision disability among adults7.1%6.5–7.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6421.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)14.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)2.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle2.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription92.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate74.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population9.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households53.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+16.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age39.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$74,709$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$279,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,155$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.9 yr ± 0.6978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.69 years of 77.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured