Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

78641

in Leander, TexasPopulation 99,865

61.77/ 100

Ranked #3,657 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 11.5%)

Ranked #114 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 6.2%)

Ranked #35 of 89 Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

759 units

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

87.5 days/year

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST63rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$135,024

in the top 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.2%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.8%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.3%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.5%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

27.8%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97.5%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Leander, Texas (ZIP 78641) ranks in the top 11.5% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,657th) and the top 6.2% of Texas (114th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: subsidized affordable housing resides in the top 2.4% nationally, and household income lands in the top 6.0% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease registers in the bottom 4.1% nationally, and hearing disability sits in the bottom 5.0% nationally. Modeled stroke rests in the bottom 4.3% nationally, energy burden is in the bottom 4.3% nationally, and high blood pressure stands in the bottom 5.8% nationally. Home broadband subscription settles in the top 8.7% nationally. On the other hand, modeled extreme heat lies in the top 3.7% nationally, and expected annual loss resides in the top 3.8% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 78613, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.6 ± 0.9 years. A median household income of $135,024 predicts 81.3 years — 2.7 years below.

    Ranked #3,692 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.6 ± 0.9 years. The 44 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 80.6 years — 2.0 years below them.

    Ranked #1,593 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.3%17.4–21.3
High blood pressure among adults27.8%25.2–30.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.4%5.9–7.0
Current asthma among adults9.4%8.5–10.5
Coronary heart disease among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.4%4.0–4.8
Depression among adults22.0%19.5–24.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.1%8.0–10.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.6%29.7–35.6
Obesity among adults32.3%28.0–36.7
Stroke among adults2.3%2.1–2.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.6%7.3–10.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.2%9.9–12.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.6%68.7–74.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.6%71.5–77.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%86.3–89.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.5%59.9–67.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.2%61.5–66.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.2%71.8–81.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.2%15.8–20.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.3%9.1–11.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.7%18.1–23.5
Short sleep duration among adults33.4%29.8–37.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.2%13.7–16.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.1%14.5–17.7
Frequent physical distress among adults10.5%9.5–11.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.1%11.0–13.4
Any disability among adults24.0%21.4–26.7
Hearing disability among adults4.8%4.4–5.3
Independent living disability among adults6.1%5.5–6.7
Mobility disability among adults9.6%8.6–10.7
Self-care disability among adults2.6%2.4–2.8
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.4–3.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6411.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)4.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)51.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)3.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle1.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription97.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate77.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population17.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households41.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+9.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age37.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$135,024$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$480,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,943$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.6 yr ± 0.4578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.45 years of 78.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured