Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

78615

in Coupland, TexasPopulation 1,637

54.04/ 100

Ranked #10,650 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #323 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #55 of 89 Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

67.2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

89.6 days/year

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

2.2%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

144.8 days/year

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST63rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

7.7%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

17%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST54th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.59 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Coupland, Texas (ZIP 78615) ranks in the top 33% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,650th) and the top 17% of Texas (323rd).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: fatal road crashes lies in the top 1.6% nationally. Against that, PFOA in drinking water resides at the national maximum, and PFOS in drinking water lands at the national maximum. Modeled extreme heat registers in the top 3.1% nationally, PFAS in drinking water sits at the national maximum, and modeled nitrate rests in the top 5.5% nationally. Modeled humid heat is in the top 6.1% nationally, crowded housing stands in the top 7.3% nationally, and modeled uninsured settles in the top 7.6% nationally. Fiber broadband lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 78653, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 24%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.5%21.7–25.4
High blood pressure among adults32.8%30.5–35.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.9%7.3–8.6
Current asthma among adults9.3%8.5–10.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.6–6.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.1%5.4–6.9
Depression among adults21.5%19.4–23.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.8%10.7–13.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.9%34.4–39.4
Obesity among adults34.0%30.5–37.5
Stroke among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.7%9.2–12.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years17.0%14.9–19.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.9%73.7–78.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.2%72.8–77.6
Cholesterol screening among adults87.6%86.3–88.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.4%61.3–67.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.6%56.2–61.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.3%70.2–79.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%15.3–19.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.7%10.2–13.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.3%22.5–28.2
Short sleep duration among adults33.0%30.1–36.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.8%17.9–21.9
Frequent mental distress among adults15.9%14.5–17.4
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.7–14.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.5%12.2–15.0
Any disability among adults29.1%26.4–31.9
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.6
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.8–8.3
Mobility disability among adults13.5%12.1–15.0
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.3–4.0
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.7–5.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6417.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)10.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)5.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle0.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription75.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)37.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate82.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population12.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households45.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+19.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age33.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$80,938$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$441,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.7 yr ± 1.4378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.43 years of 79.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured