Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

78610

in Buda, TexasPopulation 48,319

57.81/ 100

Ranked #6,563 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #198 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 10.6%)

Ranked #48 of 89 Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Dry extreme heat

87.4 days/year

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

150 days/year

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.3%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

17.4%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST56th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.5%

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.4%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

290 units

in the top 8.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.1%

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

28.5%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

Buda, Texas (ZIP 78610), by its overall standing, sits in the top 20% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,563rd) and the top 10.6% of Texas (198th).

continue reading

Several readings land clearly in this area's favor and shape the picture: modeled coronary heart disease registers in the bottom 4.6% nationally, energy burden stands in the bottom 5.2% nationally, and stroke lands in the bottom 5.4% nationally. Subsidized affordable housing is in the top 8.5% nationally, modeled hearing disability resides in the bottom 7.2% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure rests in the bottom 7.0% nationally. Set against that, modeled extreme heat lies in the top 3.7% nationally, and expected annual loss sits in the top 4.6% nationally. Modeled humid heat settles in the top 4.7% nationally, and uninsured registers in the top 7.1% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 78619, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 39%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.4%17.0–22.0
High blood pressure among adults28.5%25.1–32.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.9%5.4–6.5
Current asthma among adults9.2%8.1–10.3
Coronary heart disease among adults4.3%3.9–4.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.4%3.9–4.9
Depression among adults21.2%18.2–24.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.0%8.8–11.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.9%29.2–36.8
Obesity among adults34.5%28.6–41.0
Stroke among adults2.4%2.2–2.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.1%6.8–9.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years17.4%15.2–19.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.5%68.2–74.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.9%67.9–75.6
Cholesterol screening among adults86.0%84.3–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.2%57.8–66.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.6%58.4–64.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.6%66.6–80.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.0%15.9–22.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.6%9.1–12.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.7%19.4–26.3
Short sleep duration among adults34.1%29.3–39.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.8%15.7–19.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.1%14.3–17.9
Frequent physical distress among adults11.5%10.2–12.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.4%12.0–14.9
Any disability among adults25.9%22.6–29.3
Hearing disability among adults5.1%4.5–5.7
Independent living disability among adults6.5%5.8–7.2
Mobility disability among adults10.6%9.4–12.0
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.7–3.3
Vision disability among adults4.5%4.2–4.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–649.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)7.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)42.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)3.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle1.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription95.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate78.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population9.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households45.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+9.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age36.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$119,698$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$408,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,867$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured