Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

78619

in Driftwood, TexasPopulation 6,693

64.42/ 100

Ranked #2,241 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 7.0%)

Ranked #66 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 3.6%)

Ranked #18 of 89 Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$183,393

in the top 1.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

79.1 days/year

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST49th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.93%

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.17 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.2%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.4%

in the bottom 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.0%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

139.5 days/year

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

5.2%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Driftwood, Texas (ZIP 78619) lands in the top 7.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,241st) and the top 3.6% of Texas (66th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: household income lies in the top 1.6% nationally, and modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 4.7% nationally. Poverty lands in the bottom 5.2% nationally, and mental-health providers registers in the top 5.5% nationally. Modeled independent living disability sits in the bottom 3.6% nationally, energy burden rests in the bottom 3.7% nationally, and cognitive disability is in the bottom 5.1% nationally. Modeled tooth loss stands in the bottom 2.6% nationally. On the other hand, modeled extreme heat settles in the top 5.0% nationally, and humid heat lies in the top 7.5% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 78737, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 99%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.4 ± 2.0 years. A median household income of $183,393 predicts 82.5 years — 2.1 years below.

    Ranked #2,852 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.1%22.0–28.4
High blood pressure among adults32.9%29.0–37.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.3–10.3
Current asthma among adults9.3%8.2–10.5
Coronary heart disease among adults5.1%4.5–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.8%4.1–5.6
Depression among adults21.1%18.0–24.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.1%8.6–11.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.7%33.4–42.2
Obesity among adults31.8%25.8–38.3
Stroke among adults2.6%2.4–2.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.2%4.2–6.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.8%6.5–9.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.7%74.1–80.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.9%73.1–80.2
Cholesterol screening among adults90.9%89.5–92.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.7%66.3–75.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.3%67.3–73.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.9%71.1–84.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.8%14.7–21.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.9%7.3–10.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.3%14.3–20.8
Short sleep duration among adults30.9%26.1–36.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.6%11.7–15.8
Frequent mental distress among adults13.6%12.0–15.4
Frequent physical distress among adults10.7%9.3–12.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.0%8.7–11.4
Any disability among adults22.9%19.6–26.5
Hearing disability among adults5.7%5.0–6.5
Independent living disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.9
Mobility disability among adults10.2%8.8–11.9
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.2–2.8
Vision disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–644.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)0.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)62.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)6.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription97.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate95.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population3.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households56.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+26.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age44.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$183,393$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$810,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,786$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.4 yr ± 1.0478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.04 years of 80.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured