Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

Archived release. This page is frozen at the data release below and will not change. Current data is at the latest ranking.

Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX metro ZIP codes, ranked by the ZipVitals Score

Every Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX metro ZIP code (ZCTA) with a ZipVitals Score, ranked within the metro — descriptive of documented conditions, never a verdict on the people who live there.

Data release 202689 ZIP codes in this ranking

Download the data (CSV)How the ZipVitals Score works
89 of 89 shown
#ZIP code · locatorScore
  1. 35778746in Austin · 28,256 residents71.43
  2. 49878739in Austin · 20,659 residents70.53
  3. 56778733in Austin · 9,029 residents70.14
  4. 70778738in Bee Cave · 31,019 residents69.34
  5. 74378703in Austin · 23,483 residents69.13
  6. 83978731in Austin · 27,507 residents68.67
  7. 85478759in Austin · 43,182 residents68.62
  8. 1,00078717in Austin · 37,262 residents68.08
  9. 1,09178730in Austin · 9,142 residents67.70
  10. 1,21478750in Austin · 29,277 residents67.25
  11. 1,30478732in Austin · 21,087 residents66.92
  12. 1,40778701in Austin · 11,824 residents66.59
  13. 1,45478749in Austin · 34,562 residents66.47
  14. 1,46178735in Austin · 20,996 residents66.45
  15. 1,61578727in Austin · 29,958 residents66.01
  16. 1,71678726in Austin · 14,506 residents65.76
  17. 1,83578737in Austin · 27,023 residents65.44
  18. 2,24178619in Driftwood · 6,693 residents64.42
  19. 2,25078704in Austin · 50,688 residents64.40
  20. 2,33978729in Austin · 30,460 residents64.21
  21. 2,42678757in Austin · 23,856 residents64.03
  22. 2,43778756in Austin · 9,197 residents64.01
  23. 2,43878681in Round Rock · 56,691 residents64.01
  24. 2,45578613in Cedar Park · 89,956 residents63.98
  25. 2,52778751in Austin · 16,961 residents63.86
  26. 2,63978734in Lakeway · 22,145 residents63.64
  27. 2,76078620in Dripping Springs · 22,860 residents63.40
  28. 2,78078633in Georgetown · 29,309 residents63.36
  29. 2,99978736in Austin · 9,651 residents62.95
  30. 3,04078652in Manchaca · 5,287 residents62.89
  31. 3,06678722in Austin · 6,767 residents62.83
  32. 3,15378748in Austin · 55,631 residents62.67
  33. 3,33278628in Georgetown · 50,822 residents62.31
  34. 3,58578665in Round Rock · 66,171 residents61.88
  35. 3,65778641in Leander · 99,865 residents61.77
  36. 3,93778669in Briarcliff · 12,592 residents61.31
  37. 4,11678702in Austin · 25,985 residents61.02
  38. 4,22278745in Austin · 61,219 residents60.86
  39. 4,67378723in Austin · 38,129 residents60.24
  40. 4,82878660in Pflugerville · 124,834 residents60.05
  41. 4,85578728in Austin · 26,777 residents60.02
  42. 4,99078642in Liberty Hill · 26,434 residents59.83
  43. 5,14678634in Hutto · 46,413 residents59.60
  44. 5,30378754in Austin · 32,690 residents59.38
  45. 5,33578645in Lago Vista · 15,256 residents59.33
  46. 5,71878747in Austin · 22,180 residents58.84
  47. 5,88478721in Austin · 10,997 residents58.61
  48. 6,56378610in Buda · 48,319 residents57.81
  49. 6,81878653in Manor · 41,291 residents57.48
  50. 7,39778626in Georgetown · 48,072 residents56.87
  51. 8,51178725in Austin · 10,746 residents55.80
  52. 8,52078663in Round Mountain · 503 residents55.80
  53. 8,74378664in Round Rock · 62,060 residents55.60
  54. 9,46878676in Wimberley · 15,822 residents54.98
  55. 10,65078615in Coupland · 1,637 residents54.04
  56. 10,94376578in Thrall · 1,762 residents53.81
  57. 11,61578753in Austin · 56,920 residents53.31
  58. 11,83378758in Austin · 49,617 residents53.16
  59. 11,97078640in Kyle · 77,531 residents53.08
  60. 12,37178744in Austin · 50,986 residents52.80
  61. 12,82976527in Florence · 4,918 residents52.45
  62. 12,93878741in Austin · 45,951 residents52.38
  63. 14,95776537in Jarrell · 16,272 residents50.92
  64. 15,42078602in Bastrop · 38,190 residents50.60
  65. 15,43078659in Paige · 2,660 residents50.60
  66. 15,65578724in Austin · 31,103 residents50.43
  67. 15,69278752in Austin · 23,317 residents50.41
  68. 17,39276574in Taylor · 20,242 residents49.19
  69. 17,44578705in Austin · 33,238 residents49.15
  70. 18,07278666in San Marcos · 88,583 residents48.70
  71. 18,61678621in Elgin · 30,411 residents48.25
  72. 18,70876511in Bartlett · 2,702 residents48.18
  73. 19,16276530in Granger · 2,598 residents47.82
  74. 19,17778719in Austin · 1,796 residents47.80
  75. 19,72978953in Rosanky · 1,089 residents47.35
  76. 19,76978957in Smithville · 10,543 residents47.32
  77. 19,97678622in Fentress · 331 residents47.16
  78. 20,71778644in Lockhart · 22,348 residents46.54
  79. 20,96578612in Cedar Creek · 19,799 residents46.32
  80. 20,99278661in Prairie Lea · 835 residents46.30
  81. 22,38778662in Red Rock · 3,015 residents45.01
  82. 22,48078650in Mc Dade · 2,409 residents44.94
  83. 24,07278656in Maxwell · 2,847 residents43.34
  84. 24,16678616in Mustang Ridge · 10,683 residents43.24
  85. 24,31278617in Del Valle · 30,756 residents43.07
  86. 24,45678648in Luling · 7,863 residents42.92
  87. 25,71178712in Austin · 201 residents41.44
  88. 28,95478655in Martindale · 3,730 residents36.09
  89. 30,03878742in Austin · 847 residents33.04

Don’t see a ZIP code you expected? Not every ZIP carries a Score — 1 of this metro's 90 don’t have enough measured data across the nine health domains, and PO-box-only ZIPs aren’t mapped areas. Any ZIP’s own page explains its standing. Look up any ZIP code →

How this ranking works

Ranks are each ZIP code’s position in the full national ZipVitals Score ranking, so the numbers jump — this metro holds 89 of the tens of thousands of scored US ZIP codes — and they never change with the sort direction; the rank a ZIP carries here is the rank it carries everywhere on this site. A ZIP whose data is too thin to score is held out entirely rather than filled from county or metro figures.

Cite this ranking

The permalink /metro/austin-round-rock-san-marcos-tx/ranking/2026-28662750 resolves to this exact release and never changes; an always-latest version lives at /metro/austin-round-rock-san-marcos-tx/ranking. Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.

A high score describes favorable documented conditions — never a claim about residents. Where ZIP codes score low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.