Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

74569

in Stringtown, OklahomaPopulation 584

33.74/ 100

Ranked #29,826 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 7.0%)

Ranked #513 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Hearing disability

13.7%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

24.9%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.3%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.8%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.6 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US5th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

48.4%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

78%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

67.7%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST51st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.6%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

24.1%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

The read

Stringtown, Oklahoma (ZIP 74569), overall, ranks in the bottom 7.0% nationally (29,826th) and the bottom 19% of Oklahoma (513th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Several serious readings shape the profile and deserve first mention: modeled hearing disability is in the top 1.1% nationally, mobility disability sits in the top 3.6% nationally, and coronary heart disease lands in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled stroke lies in the top 5.3% nationally, walkability stands in the bottom 5.2% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure rests in the top 5.4% nationally. Modeled mammography registers in the bottom 7.0% nationally, and independent living disability resides in the top 8.4% nationally. Modeled tooth loss settles in the top 8.6% nationally. On the better side, modeled tree cover is in the top 5.7% nationally.

ZIP 74525, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall. Modeled stroke is in the top 5.3% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 7%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 10%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.1%34.1–41.9
High blood pressure among adults48.4%43.6–52.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.7%9.6–11.8
Current asthma among adults12.1%10.7–13.6
Coronary heart disease among adults11.3%10.0–12.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.8%11.0–14.8
Depression among adults24.6%21.0–28.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.3%14.9–19.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.9%39.1–48.8
Obesity among adults40.5%32.2–48.7
Stroke among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.1%20.0–28.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.0%8.9–13.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.3%78.5–83.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.5%75.8–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults85.5%83.4–87.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.9%54.8–66.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.9%45.8–53.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.7%58.1–76.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.1%9.8–14.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.9%18.6–25.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.8%31.1–42.5
Short sleep duration among adults36.9%30.1–43.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.3%23.6–31.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%15.7–20.1
Frequent physical distress among adults18.5%16.2–21.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.2%16.8–21.7
Any disability among adults46.6%41.3–51.8
Hearing disability among adults13.7%12.2–15.4
Independent living disability among adults12.6%11.0–14.4
Mobility disability among adults24.9%21.7–28.3
Self-care disability among adults6.3%5.5–7.2
Vision disability among adults8.4%7.4–9.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.2%21.2–29.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.0%17.5–24.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.3%15.8–22.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.1%11.9–16.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.3–12.4
Loneliness among adults31.5%26.2–37.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.6–13.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–6427.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)6.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)5.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle0.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription93.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate88.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households58.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+14.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age37.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$61,818$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$120,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$769$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.9 yr ± 2.5078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.50 years of 82.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured