Skip to main content
ZipVitals

How Oklahoma's ZIP codes measure up on health

The ZipVitals Score across Oklahoma — built one ZIP code at a time, then rolled up to the state by resident population.

Data release 2026634 of 648 ZIP codes scored · 4.0M residents represented

Score snapshot

43.68Statewide ZipVitals Scorepopulation-weighted average of its ZIP codes
40.00Median scoremiddle of 634 scored ZIPs
64.79Highest score73151 · Oklahoma City
20.89Lowest score74110 · Tulsa
43.90Spreadpoints between highest & lowest ZIP

People & national context

#48State rankof 51 states and equivalents with a computed score
85%Residents in below-average ZIPs3.4M of 4.0M, in ZIPs scoring under the national average (53.48)
0.94MResidents in the top 50 ZIPs23% of the state
0.31MResidents in the bottom 50 ZIPs8% of the state
0ZIPs in the national top 100

Oklahoma's ZIP codes, ranked

Highest-scoring

Top 50 of 634
  1. 173151in Oklahoma City · 2,254 residents64.79
  2. 273013in Edmond · 58,023 residents60.91
  3. 373012in Edmond · 46,993 residents60.89
  4. 473025in Edmond · 16,914 residents60.66
  5. 573116in Oklahoma City · 10,211 residents60.51
  6. 673142in Oklahoma City · 17,548 residents60.34
  7. 774137in Tulsa · 28,533 residents60.11
  8. 873007in Arcadia · 3,170 residents59.95
  9. 973034in Edmond · 48,831 residents59.38
  10. 1073103in Oklahoma City · 5,486 residents59.02
  11. 1174114in Tulsa · 15,944 residents57.50
  12. 1273162in Oklahoma City · 28,728 residents57.43
  13. 1373173in Oklahoma City · 4,780 residents57.29
  14. 1473131in Oklahoma City · 3,845 residents57.09
  15. 1573104in Oklahoma City · 3,692 residents56.69
  16. 1673134in Oklahoma City · 7,522 residents56.53
  17. 1773705in Enid · 359 residents56.09
  18. 1873947in Keyes · 499 residents55.87
  19. 1974008in Bixby · 34,006 residents55.68
  20. 2073557in Medicine Park · 261 residents55.28
  21. 2173937in Felt · 278 residents55.08
  22. 2273003in Edmond · 23,236 residents54.94
  23. 2373150in Oklahoma City · 5,688 residents54.91
  24. 2474037in Jenks · 24,547 residents54.81
  25. 2573078in Piedmont · 13,021 residents54.79
  26. 2673145in Oklahoma City · 3,612 residents54.79
  27. 2773170in Oklahoma City · 41,458 residents54.67
  28. 2873118in Oklahoma City · 14,262 residents54.57
  29. 2973753in Kremlin · 378 residents54.50
  30. 3073738in Garber · 1,012 residents54.49
  31. 3173743in Hillsdale · 89 residents54.46
  32. 3274133in Tulsa · 48,699 residents54.35
  33. 3373727in Carrier · 152 residents54.31
  34. 3474011in Broken Arrow · 33,900 residents54.19
  35. 3573072in Norman · 50,881 residents53.77
  36. 3673939in Goodwell · 1,421 residents53.58
  37. 3774135in Tulsa · 20,138 residents53.49
  38. 3873931in Balko · 434 residents53.29
  39. 3973120in Oklahoma City · 35,559 residents53.03
  40. 4073099in Yukon · 91,014 residents52.93
  41. 4173179in Oklahoma City · 8,532 residents52.62
  42. 4274119in Tulsa · 3,670 residents52.46
  43. 4374055in Owasso · 51,381 residents52.41
  44. 4473165in Oklahoma City · 8,357 residents52.37
  45. 4574012in Broken Arrow · 65,060 residents52.31
  46. 4674132in Tulsa · 10,858 residents52.14
  47. 4774640in Hunter · 327 residents52.07
  48. 4873503in Fort Sill · 11,468 residents51.80
  49. 4973020in Choctaw · 25,645 residents51.70
  50. 5073016in Cashion · 2,492 residents51.58
Open the full Oklahoma ranking →One page, all 634 scored ZIPs — sortable by score, residents, or place

What the distribution shows

Across Oklahoma’s 648 ZIP codes, the ZipVitals Score spans a wide range. 634 of them carry enough measured coverage across all nine health domains to enter the population-weighted composite above; the rest are held out rather than filled from a coarser geography.

Assembled from the same ZIP-level data as every per-ZIP page. Read the full method →

Where Oklahoma stands, domain by domain

The ZipVitals Score above combines nine domains of health into one number. This is where Oklahoma's ZIP codes sit against ZIP codes across the country on each of them, weighted by how many residents live in each one — strongest at the top.

Strongest domain

Healthcare Access · 68th

Weighted by residents, this state’s ZIP codes sit around the 68th percentile of US ZIP codes here — its highest of the nine scoring domains.

Weakest domain

Climate / Disaster Risk · 17th

Weighted by residents, this state’s ZIP codes sit around the 17th percentile of US ZIP codes here — its lowest of the nine scoring domains.

Healthcare Access68
Chronic Disease Burden44
Risk Behavior41
Social Need / SDOH40
Environmental Hazard38
Disability34
Preventive Care27
Mental Health26
Climate / Disaster Risk17

Read each bar as a national percentile from 0 to 100. The dark line marks the national median: a bar past it means Oklahoma's ZIP codes typically place above most ZIP codes in the country on that domain. A domain Oklahoma cannot place honestly is shown greyed as "Not enough data" rather than given a number.

Each figure is the population-weighted average of this state's ZIP codes' standing on that domain, compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes. A ZIP code counts toward a domain only if it carries enough measured data on it and enough of Oklahoma's residents live in the ZIP codes that do; the rest are held out rather than filled in from a coarser geography. Read the full method →

Why this matters

The ZipVitals Score combines nine domains of health — from chronic disease and preventive care to environmental hazard, social need, and healthcare access — into one 0–100 index for each ZIP code, computed the same way everywhere from public federal and academic data. The Oklahoma figures on this page are population-weighted rollups of those per-ZIP scores, so they describe Oklahoma's residents rather than a coarser geography relabeled as the state.

A high score describes favorable documented conditions; it is not a claim about individual residents, and it does not capture everything that shapes a community's health. Where a ZIP code scores low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.