Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

74340

in Disney, OklahomaPopulation 182

27.05/ 100

Ranked #31,236 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 2.6%)

Ranked #617 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (bottom 2.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Hearing disability

15.3%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

28.8%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

62.1%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

13.0%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.7%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

53.6%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

21%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

47.9%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

10.3%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.3%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Disney, Oklahoma (ZIP 74340), overall, ranks in the bottom 2.6% nationally (31,236th) and the bottom 2.7% of Oklahoma (617th).

continue reading

This area's pressures are easy to read across the measures: modeled hearing disability registers in the top 0.4% nationally, mobility disability resides in the top 0.9% nationally, and mammography settles in the bottom 1.2% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease is in the top 0.8% nationally, stroke sits in the top 1.8% nationally, and high blood pressure lands in the top 1.2% nationally. Modeled diabetes lies in the top 2.5% nationally, and high cholesterol stands in the top 0.9% nationally. Modeled self-care disability rests in the top 4.7% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled binge drinking registers in the bottom 1.7% nationally.

ZIP 74342, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall. Modeled coronary heart disease registers in the top 0.8% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults41.4%37.3–45.9
High blood pressure among adults53.6%49.0–58.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%9.8–12.3
Current asthma among adults12.8%11.3–14.6
Coronary heart disease among adults13.0%11.5–14.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults14.7%12.6–17.0
Depression among adults24.3%20.7–28.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults21.0%18.3–24.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened47.9%43.0–52.9
Obesity among adults45.0%37.3–53.3
Stroke among adults6.7%6.0–7.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.3%18.5–26.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.3%8.8–13.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.8%80.0–85.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.5%79.2–85.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.5%85.4–89.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.2%52.5–63.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.2%45.2–53.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years62.1%52.6–71.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.3%8.3–12.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.8%20.3–27.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults42.0%36.3–48.4
Short sleep duration among adults38.1%31.5–44.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults30.7%26.7–35.2
Frequent mental distress among adults18.2%15.9–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults20.8%18.2–23.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.7%17.2–22.4
Any disability among adults50.4%45.1–56.0
Hearing disability among adults15.3%13.6–17.1
Independent living disability among adults13.7%11.9–15.6
Mobility disability among adults28.8%25.2–32.9
Self-care disability among adults7.3%6.4–8.5
Vision disability among adults9.8%8.6–11.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.5%21.6–29.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.4%20.6–29.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults22.6%18.8–27.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.7%13.3–18.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.5–13.9
Loneliness among adults30.7%25.7–35.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.9%11.0–14.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate26.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–6442.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)11.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)3.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription91.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate77.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population2.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households53.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+22.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age53.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$46,875$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$160,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$713$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth86.7 yr ± 3.2678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.26 years of 86.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured