ZIP code
74560
in Pittsburg, OklahomaPopulation 435
36.83/ 100
Ranked #28,617 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.8%)
Ranked #440 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (bottom 31%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Hearing disability
12.7%
in the top 2.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST86thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Walkability
1.7 intersections/sq mi
in the bottom 5.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS6thDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Short sleep
42.5%
in the top 7.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
22.4%
in the top 8.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST77thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
73%
in the top 7.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST98thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
47.1%
in the top 7.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST87thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
10.3%
in the top 7.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST84thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
12.3%
in the bottom 8.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST20thUS8thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
58%
in the bottom 9.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST21stUS9thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
43.2%
in the top 9.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST85thUS90thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›The read
Pittsburg, Oklahoma (ZIP 74560), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 10.8% nationally (28,617th) and the bottom 31% of Oklahoma (440th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: modeled tree cover stands in the top 7.8% nationally, and binge drinking lands in the bottom 8.5% nationally. Set against that, modeled hearing disability is in the top 2.6% nationally, walkability resides in the bottom 5.7% nationally, and modeled short sleep rests in the top 7.8% nationally. Modeled mobility disability lies in the top 8.4% nationally, and high blood pressure sits in the top 7.5% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease settles in the top 7.7% nationally. Fiber broadband registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled colon screening stands in the bottom 9.3% nationally.
The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 74547, just across the boundary. Modeled mobility disability stands in the top 8.4% nationally.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 63%
14%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 8%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 27%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 28%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 14%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 32%
8%
Disability
healthier than 10%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 10%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 27%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 77%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 67%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 69%
8%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 54%
16%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 20%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 24%
11%
Disability
healthier than 27%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 16%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 30%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
74525
Oklahomashares a border
Score 35.04
Closest healthier
74547
Oklahomashares a border
Score 39.76
Similar health profile
75560
Texas99% similar profile
Score 33.93
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 36.2% | 33.2–39.4 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 47.1% | 43.5–50.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.1% | 9.3–11.0 |
| Current asthma among adults | 12.4% | 11.2–13.7 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.3% | 9.3–11.3 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 11.1% | 9.8–12.5 |
| Depression among adults | 24.7% | 21.8–27.8 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 16.1% | 14.4–18.0 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 43.2% | 39.5–47.0 |
| Obesity among adults | 40.4% | 34.7–46.5 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.2% | 4.7–5.7 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 20.0% | 17.0–23.4 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 9.9% | 8.4–11.5 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 80.4% | 78.0–82.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 80.8% | 78.1–83.4 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 86.4% | 84.8–87.8 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 58.0% | 52.9–63.1 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 52.4% | 48.8–56.1 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 70.4% | 62.0–77.9 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 12.3% | 10.4–14.4 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 19.9% | 17.5–22.6 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 34.5% | 30.3–39.0 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 42.5% | 36.5–48.7 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 25.0% | 22.2–27.9 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.8% | 16.1–19.8 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 17.6% | 15.8–19.6 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 18.1% | 16.2–20.1 |
| Any disability among adults | 43.3% | 39.3–47.5 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 12.7% | 11.6–13.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 11.1% | 10.0–12.4 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 22.4% | 20.0–24.9 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.6% | 5.1–6.2 |
| Vision disability among adults | 7.5% | 6.8–8.3 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 25.3% | 21.7–29.1 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 19.6% | 16.8–22.6 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 16.3% | 13.9–19.0 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 13.7% | 11.8–15.8 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 10.2% | 9.0–11.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 32.0% | 27.1–37.0 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 10.6% | 9.2–12.2 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 16.2% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 16.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 16.1% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 19.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 7.5% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 10.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 7.5% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 18.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 1.4% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643 |
| Households without a vehicle | 7.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643 |
| Broadband subscription | 86.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 85.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 17.2% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 20.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643 |
| Homeownership rate | 83.9% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 78.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 2.7% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 2.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645 |
| Single-parent households | 58.4% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640 |
| Population 65+ | 28.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 18.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645 |
| Median age | 48.8 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642 |
| Median household income | $45,000 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616 |
| Median home value | $125,000 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615 |
| Median gross rent | $663 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $839 ($628–$1,136) n=546 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 75.9 yr ± 0.74 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.74 years of 75.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured