ZIP code
74430
in Crowder, OklahomaPopulation 530
40.56/ 100
Ranked #26,358 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 18%)
Ranked #288 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (top 45%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Distance to an emergency room
29 mi
in the top 2.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.
Full methodology ›Loud transportation noise
2.7%
in the top 4.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.
Full methodology ›PFAS in drinking water
60%
in the top 8.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Crowded housing
7.1%
in the top 8.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
97.3%
in the top 9.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST97thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Dry extreme heat
48.3 days/year
in the top 9.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST21stUS90thDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.
Full methodology ›Short sleep
41.3%
in the top 11.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS88thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
11 mi
in the top 12.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST92ndUS88thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 12.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST9thUS13thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Arsenic in groundwater
9.5%
in the top 18% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS82ndDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›The read
On the composite measure, Crowder, Oklahoma (ZIP 74430) stands in the bottom 18% nationally (26,358th) and the top 45% of Oklahoma (288th).
A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: households without a vehicle lands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Home broadband subscription settles in the top 9.5% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests in the top 12.5% nationally. By contrast, distance to an emergency room lands in the top 2.1% nationally, modeled loud transportation noise settles in the top 4.5% nationally, and modeled pfas rests in the top 8.0% nationally. Crowded housing lands in the top 8.3% nationally, modeled extreme heat settles in the top 9.9% nationally, and modeled short sleep rests in the top 11.6% nationally. Slow internet speeds lands in the top 12.5% nationally.
For clarity, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 74425, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Nothing measured is lifting this score.
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 25%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 29%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 24%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 30%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 21%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 25%
8%
Disability
healthier than 23%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 13%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 12%
5%
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 70%
13%
Disability
healthier than 61%
7%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 57%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 60%
16%
Mental Health
healthier than 53%
8%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 20%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 38%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 27%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 12%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
74425
Oklahomashares a border
Score 41.15
Closest healthier
74554
Oklahomaabout 12 mi away
Score 43.11
Similar health profile
74651
Oklahoma98% similar profile
Score 35.89
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 32.4% | 29.3–35.5 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 42.2% | 38.5–46.0 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 9.3% | 8.5–10.2 |
| Current asthma among adults | 12.0% | 10.8–13.4 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 8.2% | 7.2–9.3 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 9.5% | 8.1–11.1 |
| Depression among adults | 25.5% | 22.3–28.8 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 13.3% | 11.6–15.2 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 40.4% | 36.7–44.2 |
| Obesity among adults | 38.8% | 32.8–45.2 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.3% | 3.7–4.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 16.6% | 13.8–19.9 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 9.7% | 7.9–11.8 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 77.8% | 75.3–80.1 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 79.3% | 76.4–82.1 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 85.0% | 83.1–87.0 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 62.5% | 57.3–67.5 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 56.6% | 52.9–60.5 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 71.5% | 63.5–79.1 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.6% | 11.5–16.1 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 18.1% | 15.4–21.1 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 31.7% | 27.3–36.6 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 41.3% | 35.0–47.9 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 21.9% | 19.0–25.3 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 18.1% | 16.2–20.1 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 15.7% | 13.9–17.8 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 17.5% | 15.4–19.7 |
| Any disability among adults | 39.4% | 35.1–44.1 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 10.5% | 9.3–11.7 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 10.1% | 8.9–11.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 18.8% | 16.4–21.6 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.6% | 4.0–5.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.3% | 5.5–7.1 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 24.3% | 20.6–28.5 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 17.7% | 14.6–20.9 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 14.6% | 12.0–17.5 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.7% | 10.7–15.0 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 9.2% | 7.9–10.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 32.4% | 27.2–37.8 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 9.5% | 8.1–11.1 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 15.7% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 16.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 15.7% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 19.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 20.9% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 10.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 38.6% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 18.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 2.6% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643 |
| Broadband subscription | 97.3% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 85.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 13.7% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 20.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643 |
| Homeownership rate | 87.1% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 78.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 7.1% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 2.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.8% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645 |
| Single-parent households | 59.6% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640 |
| Population 65+ | 27.2% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 18.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645 |
| Median age | 56.4 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642 |
| Median household income | $56,042 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616 |
| Median home value | $121,700 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615 |
| Median gross rent | $738 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $839 ($628–$1,136) n=546 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 80.9 yr ± 1.96 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.96 years of 80.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured