Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

63849

in Gobler, MissouriPopulation 176

37.35/ 100

Ranked #28,369 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 11.6%)

Ranked #787 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Home broadband subscription

35.2%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.7%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.6%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

25.1%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

19.5%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

49.8%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.9%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

46.1%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

2.8%

in the bottom 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

36.6%

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

The read

Gobler, Missouri (ZIP 63849) ranks in the bottom 11.6% nationally (28,369th) and the bottom 21% of Missouri (787th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A number of readings press hard on the profile and set its tone: home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 0.7% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease resides in the top 2.3% nationally. Modeled hearing disability stands in the top 2.8% nationally, and mobility disability sits in the top 3.4% nationally. Modeled diabetes resides in the top 4.6% nationally, high blood pressure stands in the top 3.6% nationally, and stroke sits in the top 4.7% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol resides in the top 2.6% nationally, and homeownership stands in the bottom 4.5% nationally. On the brighter side, housing-cost burden sits in the bottom 4.2% nationally.

The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 63826, about 2.6 miles away. Modeled mobility disability sits in the top 3.4% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 17%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 9%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults39.8%36.6–42.8
High blood pressure among adults49.8%46.5–53.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.1%10.0–12.3
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.5–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults11.7%10.2–13.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.9%10.9–15.4
Depression among adults22.5%19.9–25.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.5%17.1–21.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened46.1%42.6–49.6
Obesity among adults43.3%37.6–48.8
Stroke among adults5.9%5.1–6.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.0%16.1–22.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.7%8.2–13.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.6%82.5–86.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.4%79.8–84.6
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.4–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.7%65.8–73.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.7%52.8–58.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.1%68.1–79.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.8%10.1–13.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.7%16.4–23.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults40.1%34.9–45.3
Short sleep duration among adults37.5%33.0–41.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.1%25.1–33.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.3%14.5–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults19.1%16.7–21.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.6%16.1–21.4
Any disability among adults46.1%41.2–51.1
Hearing disability among adults12.6%11.1–14.2
Independent living disability among adults11.7%10.0–13.6
Mobility disability among adults25.1%21.7–28.7
Self-care disability among adults6.2%5.2–7.3
Vision disability among adults7.6%6.5–8.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.1%18.5–24.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.5%14.5–21.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.6%11.8–17.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.0%10.9–15.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.2–11.2
Loneliness among adults31.8%28.3–35.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.3–11.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate1.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)26.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)2.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle2.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription35.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)2.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate36.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households95.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+55.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age66.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$90,685$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$116,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.7 yr ± 1.4978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.49 years of 75.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured