Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

36047

in Letohatchee, AlabamaPopulation 1,074

35.68/ 100

Ranked #29,115 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 9.3%)

Ranked #518 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #29 of 41 Montgomery, AL ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Diabetes

23.8%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

57.1%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.9%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.3%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

83.8 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

50%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

26.5%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.81 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

9.8%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.1%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Letohatchee, Alabama (ZIP 36047) sits in the bottom 9.3% nationally (29,115th) and the bottom 16% of Alabama (518th).

continue reading

A demanding profile, and several measures drive it: modeled diabetes stands in the top 0.8% nationally, high blood pressure resides in the top 0.5% nationally, and stroke sits in the top 1.4% nationally. Modeled self-care disability stands in the top 2.3% nationally, fatal road crashes resides in the top 0.9% nationally, and modeled obesity sits in the top 0.7% nationally. Modeled mobility disability stands in the top 1.9% nationally, and vision disability resides in the top 4.7% nationally. On the stronger side, elder services sits in the top 1.1% nationally, and modeled binge drinking stands in the bottom 1.1% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, elder services runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 36041, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Montgomery, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 85.6; chronic-disease standing 2.2 (bottom 10%) — 83 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #348 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.1%34.9–41.2
High blood pressure among adults57.1%53.5–60.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.1%7.5–8.8
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.1–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults10.4%9.4–11.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.5%10.1–13.0
Depression among adults20.5%17.8–23.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults23.8%21.3–26.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.8%41.2–48.5
Obesity among adults50.0%42.9–56.7
Stroke among adults6.9%6.3–7.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.0%19.1–25.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.8%9.7–14.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.9%82.0–85.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults85.1%82.7–87.2
Cholesterol screening among adults87.9%86.4–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.1%64.1–71.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.5%46.1–52.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.2%73.6–84.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults9.8%8.2–11.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.6%16.9–22.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults37.9%33.2–42.7
Short sleep duration among adults45.0%39.4–50.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults32.8%29.2–36.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.4%15.6–19.3
Frequent physical distress among adults17.9%16.0–19.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.0%15.9–20.2
Any disability among adults44.9%40.5–49.2
Hearing disability among adults9.4%8.4–10.4
Independent living disability among adults13.6%12.0–15.1
Mobility disability among adults26.5%23.6–29.3
Self-care disability among adults8.3%7.3–9.2
Vision disability among adults10.1%9.0–11.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.1%25.4–32.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults32.0%28.0–35.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults28.6%24.8–32.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.0%19.2–24.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults15.3%13.4–17.2
Loneliness among adults36.0%31.6–40.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults17.0%14.9–19.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–644.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)5.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)4.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle3.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription75.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate92.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households65.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+37.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age54.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$50,441$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.0 yr ± 0.9578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.95 years of 73.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured