Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

35477

in Panola, AlabamaPopulation 222

26.42/ 100

Ranked #31,307 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 2.4%)

Ranked #602 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 2.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Stroke

10.0%

in the top 0.05% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

30.7%

in the top 0.04% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

11.9%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

35.3%

in the top 0.08% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

14.7%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

65.6%

in the top 0.03% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

38%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

17.9%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

40.2%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

49.6%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People living in poverty
  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health
  • Chronic conditions

Barriers to reaching care

  • Distance to the nearest emergency room
  • Households with no vehicle
  • Limited home internet for telehealth

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

Panola, Alabama (ZIP 35477), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 2.4% nationally (31,307th) and the bottom 2.8% of Alabama (602nd).

continue reading

A rural profile defined by a handful of clear readings: modeled stroke registers in the top 0.05% nationally, diabetes is in the top 0.04% nationally, and self-care disability lies in the top 0.2% nationally. Modeled mobility disability registers in the top 0.08% nationally, vision disability is in the top 0.6% nationally, and high blood pressure lies in the top 0.03% nationally. Modeled tooth loss registers in the top 0.7% nationally, and independent living disability is in the top 0.6% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health lies in the top 0.6% nationally, and short sleep registers in the top 0.4% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 35442, just across the boundary. Beyond that, the ZIP also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 1.0%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Disability

in the bottom 0.7%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Disability

in the bottom 1.0%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults44.1%39.6–48.4
High blood pressure among adults65.6%61.1–69.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.9%7.0–8.9
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.3–13.4
Coronary heart disease among adults13.5%11.6–15.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults14.0%11.4–16.8
Depression among adults18.7%15.5–22.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults30.7%26.9–34.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened47.1%42.1–52.0
Obesity among adults53.6%44.7–62.5
Stroke among adults10.0%8.5–11.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years38.0%32.9–43.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.7%9.3–17.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure87.0%85.0–88.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults87.1%84.3–89.6
Cholesterol screening among adults88.7%86.4–90.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.6%54.1–65.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults38.7%34.8–42.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.9%72.5–86.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults7.8%6.2–9.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.0%16.8–25.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults46.6%39.2–53.4
Short sleep duration among adults49.6%41.9–57.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults40.2%34.3–46.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.6%15.2–20.1
Frequent physical distress among adults20.6%17.5–23.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.7%16.4–23.1
Any disability among adults51.6%45.4–57.4
Hearing disability among adults11.2%9.6–12.9
Independent living disability among adults17.9%14.8–21.1
Mobility disability among adults35.3%30.4–39.9
Self-care disability among adults11.9%9.8–14.2
Vision disability among adults14.7%12.3–17.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults31.4%26.6–36.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults39.8%32.9–47.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults37.1%30.2–44.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.3%21.8–31.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults18.6%15.5–22.2
Loneliness among adults36.8%30.9–42.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults21.2%17.8–24.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate31.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6419.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)64.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)0.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle28.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households0.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age43.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.5 yr ± 3.4578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.45 years of 79.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured