Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

63857

in Kennett, MissouriPopulation 11,930

34.09/ 100

Ranked #29,704 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 7.4%)

Ranked #880 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 11.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Cognitive disability

22.1%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

46.3%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.49 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.0%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.25 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.57 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

22.9%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

24.5%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

97.9%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

Kennett, Missouri (ZIP 63857) ranks in the bottom 7.4% nationally (29,704th) and the bottom 11.4% of Missouri (880th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: pharmacy rests in the top 5.3% nationally, and elder services lands in the top 5.7% nationally. Outpatient settles in the top 6.0% nationally, and fiber broadband rests in the top 6.9% nationally. On the other side, modeled cognitive disability lands in the top 3.7% nationally, obesity settles in the top 2.8% nationally, and expected annual loss rests in the top 4.3% nationally. Modeled independent living disability lands in the top 6.8% nationally, mobility disability settles in the top 7.1% nationally, and tooth loss rests in the top 7.9% nationally.

Against its neighbors, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 63827, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 8%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.1 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $55,188 predicts 77.7 years — 5.6 years below.

    Ranked #5,681 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.1 ± 1.4 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 75.4 years — 3.3 years below them.

    Ranked #2,552 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.1%30.7–37.5
High blood pressure among adults44.1%39.8–48.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%7.9–9.6
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.2–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults9.0%8.1–10.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.8%10.5–13.2
Depression among adults26.3%22.6–30.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.8%13.8–17.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.8%35.6–43.9
Obesity among adults46.3%39.2–53.2
Stroke among adults5.0%4.5–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.5%20.5–28.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.3%10.4–14.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.5%75.8–81.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.6%75.0–81.8
Cholesterol screening among adults82.3%80.2–84.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.5%53.4–63.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.1%45.4–52.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.4%62.1–77.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.5%11.0–16.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.3%19.4–25.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults41.6%36.4–46.7
Short sleep duration among adults40.1%34.2–46.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.1%25.9–32.4
Frequent mental distress among adults20.0%17.8–22.2
Frequent physical distress among adults18.9%16.8–21.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.1%19.7–24.4
Any disability among adults45.9%41.2–50.5
Hearing disability among adults10.4%9.2–11.5
Independent living disability among adults13.0%11.6–14.4
Mobility disability among adults22.9%20.3–25.5
Self-care disability among adults6.0%5.4–6.6
Vision disability among adults7.7%7.0–8.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.4%19.5–25.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.0%19.4–24.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.7%17.4–22.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.2%15.2–19.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.2%11.0–13.6
Loneliness among adults35.2%30.8–39.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.9%11.5–14.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6421.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)17.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)5.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle9.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription92.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate60.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population1.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households45.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+19.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age41.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$55,188$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$115,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$649$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.1 yr ± 0.6978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.69 years of 72.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured