Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

72454

in Piggott, ArkansasPopulation 4,833

40.95/ 100

Ranked #26,072 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #228 of 562 Arkansas ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Elder-services access

0.62 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.62 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.21 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

63 µg/L

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.1%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.62 per 1,000 residents

in the top 17% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Piggott, Arkansas (ZIP 72454), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 19% nationally (26,072nd) and the top 41% of Arkansas (228th).

continue reading

Where this area is stretched, the data is unambiguous: lithium in drinking water settles in the top 8.1% nationally, modeled expected annual loss stands in the top 10.8% nationally, and modeled energy burden is in the top 8.5% nationally. Modeled hearing disability rests in the top 12.7% nationally, and cognitive disability sits in the top 14.6% nationally. Better still, elder services registers in the top 1.8% nationally, and pharmacy lands in the top 3.2% nationally. Mental-health providers resides in the top 4.0% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lies at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home settles at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, elder services runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 72430, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 75.7; chronic-disease standing 22.0 — 54 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,198 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.8%29.3–36.4
High blood pressure among adults42.9%38.5–47.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.0–11.1
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.2–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.2–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.4%9.0–12.1
Depression among adults27.0%23.2–31.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.8%11.9–15.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.9%36.4–45.3
Obesity among adults39.5%31.8–47.6
Stroke among adults4.5%4.0–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.8%16.3–23.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.0%8.1–12.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.2%76.5–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.9%75.1–82.2
Cholesterol screening among adults84.9%82.6–86.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.0%57.5–68.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.9%47.9–55.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.4%63.1–79.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.9%11.3–16.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.2%14.4–20.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.7%29.3–40.0
Short sleep duration among adults36.6%30.1–43.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.2%21.9–28.8
Frequent mental distress among adults19.1%16.8–21.4
Frequent physical distress among adults17.1%15.0–19.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.9%16.5–21.4
Any disability among adults42.0%36.9–46.8
Hearing disability among adults10.6%9.3–11.8
Independent living disability among adults10.7%9.3–12.1
Mobility disability among adults19.6%17.0–22.4
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.4
Vision disability among adults6.2%5.5–7.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.4%22.5–30.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.2%13.5–19.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.3–12.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.8%9.9–13.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.4–9.8
Loneliness among adults34.5%29.4–40.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.5–10.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (4.0–30.6%) n=574
Uninsured 18–6423.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.3% (1.5–24.1%) n=573
No HS diploma (25+)8.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.0% (3.7–23.0%) n=577
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.5% (4.4–30.5%) n=577
Unemployment rate (16+)5.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–11.6%) n=573
Households without a vehicle8.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–12.5%) n=574
Broadband subscription80.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.2% (65.0–94.7%) n=574
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.4% (4.3–33.2%) n=574
Homeownership rate66.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.6% (57.7–96.1%) n=574
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–5.7%) n=574
Foreign-born population0.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=578
Single-parent households53.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.0% (35.3–79.3%) n=571
Population 65+19.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.6–37.9%) n=578
Median age38.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.6 yr (33.6–58.1) n=573
Median household income$46,509$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$53,893 ($36,003–$79,139) n=505
Median home value$107,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$128,200 ($73,260–$235,420) n=519
Median gross rent$739$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$800 ($568–$1,094) n=393
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.3 yr ± 0.9978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.4–79.7) n=580

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.99 years of 73.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured