ZIP code
63665
in Redford, MissouriPopulation 313
37.30/ 100
Ranked #28,390 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 11.5%)
Ranked #788 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 21%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Distance to an emergency room
30.1 mi
in the top 1.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
86.8%
in the top 2.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
3.2%
in the top 3.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›Mammography
66.6%
in the bottom 4.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST2ndUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
11.8%
in the top 5.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST86thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Arsenic in groundwater
1.2%
in the bottom 6.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST20thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Median household income
$28,438
in the bottom 1.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
22.6%
in the top 7.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST84thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
20.3%
in the top 8.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST75thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›The read
In its overall standing, Redford, Missouri (ZIP 63665) lands in the bottom 11.5% nationally (28,390th) and the bottom 21% of Missouri (788th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
The profile reads plainly, and several measures carry it: distance to an emergency room is in the top 1.9% nationally, slow internet speeds sits in the top 3.6% nationally, and modeled mammography lands in the bottom 4.8% nationally. Modeled hearing disability lies in the top 5.2% nationally, household income stands in the bottom 1.6% nationally, and modeled mobility disability rests in the top 7.8% nationally. On the better side, modeled transportation noise registers at the national minimum, and tree cover resides in the top 2.4% nationally. Modeled arsenic settles in the bottom 6.6% nationally. Unemployment is at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs.
Against the wider neighborhood, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. On the overall standing, ZIP 63633, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 97%
14%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 10%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 27%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 18%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 7%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 26%
8%
Disability
healthier than 8%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 29%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 29%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
in the top 0.2%
14%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 41%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 11%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 26%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 13%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 13%
11%
Disability
healthier than 11%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 29%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 27%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
63620
Missourishares a border
Score 37.27
Closest healthier
63633
Missourishares a border
Score 37.46
Similar health profile
63437
Missouri99% similar profile
Score 40.31
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 36.4% | 32.4–40.5 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 43.7% | 38.8–48.6 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.3% | 9.2–11.4 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.0% | 9.6–12.5 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.1% | 8.7–11.5 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 12.9% | 10.6–15.3 |
| Depression among adults | 25.2% | 21.3–29.3 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 16.1% | 13.7–18.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 42.6% | 37.8–47.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 41.9% | 32.8–51.2 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.2% | 4.4–5.9 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 18.7% | 15.4–22.3 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 10.9% | 7.9–14.4 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 80.3% | 77.3–83.2 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 78.8% | 75.0–82.3 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 83.9% | 81.3–86.4 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 60.5% | 55.0–65.5 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 53.3% | 49.5–57.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 66.6% | 56.9–74.8 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 14.9% | 12.1–18.1 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 22.6% | 18.1–27.1 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 36.7% | 29.9–43.4 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 38.5% | 31.3–45.8 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 28.1% | 23.1–33.1 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 18.2% | 15.7–20.8 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 18.9% | 15.9–21.9 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 20.3% | 16.9–23.6 |
| Any disability among adults | 44.4% | 38.0–50.5 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 11.8% | 10.2–13.3 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 12.1% | 10.0–14.2 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 22.6% | 18.7–26.5 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 6.0% | 4.9–7.1 |
| Vision disability among adults | 7.2% | 6.0–8.5 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 20.7% | 17.1–24.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 17.1% | 13.5–21.4 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 14.8% | 11.4–18.4 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.9% | 10.5–15.7 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 9.6% | 7.9–11.5 |
| Loneliness among adults | 30.3% | 25.2–35.9 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 10.0% | 8.4–11.9 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MO median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 17.6% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 35.5% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 13.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 19.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 29.8% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 18.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009 |
| Broadband subscription | 78.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 86.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 28.6% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 20.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009 |
| Homeownership rate | 88.5% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 79.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010 |
| Single-parent households | 30.6% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 55.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005 |
| Population 65+ | 32.3% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010 |
| Median age | 60.2 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005 |
| Median household income | $28,438 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948 |
| Median home value | $125,800 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $813 ($553–$1,265) n=786 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MO median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 77.5 yr ± 1.70 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.70 years of 77.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured